Transfer of ‘fake’ accounts case to Islamabad in accordance with SC order, rules SHC

Published April 12, 2019
The bench rules March 15 order was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court. — Photo courtesy of SHC website
The bench rules March 15 order was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court. — Photo courtesy of SHC website

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has ruled that the order of a banking court transferring a ‘fake’ accounts and money laundering case against co-chairman of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Asif Ali Zardari, his sister and others to Islamabad was in accordance with the Supreme Court’s judgement.

On April 2, a two-judge SHC bench headed by Chief Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh dismissed a set of applications moved by Mr Zardari and others against the banking court’s order, through a short order.

According to the detailed order issued on Thursday, the main thrust of the arguments advanced by the lawyers for the applicants was that under the orders of the apex court, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) was not authorised to get the case in question (FIR No. 04/18) transferred from a banking court in Karachi to an accountability court at Islamabad and the allegations contained in the FIR did not constitute an offence falling within the ambit of the NAB Ordinance.

While reproducing some parts of the apex court’s Jan 7 judgement, the SHC ruled: “After examining the judgement of Honourable Supreme Court, we do not see any ambiguity in the said judgment which would lead us to conclude that the transfer of the case pending before the special court (arising out of FIR No. 04/2018) was excluded from the ambit of the judgement when it was ordered that a reference by the NAB be filed before the accountability court, Islamabad.”

Referring to the reliance on Article 187(2) by the lawyers for applicants, the SHC bench said the same was not applicable in the current scenario.

“As we have concluded that the transfer of the case arising out of FIR No. 04/2018 and the filing of reference at Islamabad is a consequence of the material placed before the NAB and directions of the Honourable Supreme Court,” it added.

The bench also observed that the March 15 order of the banking court was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court.

The former president, his sister Faryal Talpur, detained chairman of Omni Group Anwar Majeed, his sons, former chairman of the Pakistan Stock Exchange Hussain Lawai and others had challenged the March 15 trial court order before the SHC.

The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had named Mr Zardari, his sister Ms Talpur, Anwar Majeed, his sons and over 10 others as suspects in the interim charge sheet filed before the banking court in FIR No. 04/18 in August last year for the alleged money laundering of over Rs4 billion through fake bank accounts.

Published in Dawn, April 12th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...
Water vision
01 May, 2026

Water vision

WATER insecurity in Pakistan has been building up for decades as per capita water availability has declined from...
Vaccine policy
01 May, 2026

Vaccine policy

PAKISTAN has finally approved its first National Vaccine Policy; a step the health ministry has rightly described as...
Labour rights
Updated 01 May, 2026

Labour rights

THE annual observance of May Day should move beyond statements about the state’s commitment to the rights of...