Role of NAB prosecutor in Ashiana case questioned

Published April 10, 2019
Mr Bharwana was the legal adviser of the Punjab Land Development Com­pany, which had awarded the contract to develop the Ashiana housing scheme, counsel Ali Raza told a three-judge SC bench, headed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed. — Photo courtesy NAB website/File
Mr Bharwana was the legal adviser of the Punjab Land Development Com­pany, which had awarded the contract to develop the Ashiana housing scheme, counsel Ali Raza told a three-judge SC bench, headed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed. — Photo courtesy NAB website/File

ISLAMABAD: A senior defence counsel in the Ashiana housing scheme case appearing before the Supreme Court on Tuesday objected to the pleading of case by Jahanzaib Bhar­wana as additional prosecutor general of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), arguing that “he was legal adviser of the same company that had awarded the scheme”.

Mr Bharwana was the legal adviser of the Punjab Land Development Com­pany, which had awarded the contract to develop the Ashiana housing scheme, counsel Ali Raza told a three-judge SC bench, headed by Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed.

Explore: A timeline of developments in the Ashiana housing 'scam'

Representing Ashiana housing project coordinator Bilal Kidwai, who is undergoing a jail term, Mr Raza told the bench that Mr Bharwana was supposed to be the ‘key witness’ in the case. He said he would file objections before the court to the pleading of this case by Mr Bharwana on behalf of NAB.

The SC had taken up a set of appeals moved by NAB challenging the release of former Punjab chief minister Shahbaz Sharif, former principal secretary to then prime minister Fawad Hassan Fawad, Bilal Kidwai, Imtiaz Haider, Munir Zia and others on bail.

Read: Shahbaz Sharif, others indicted in Ashiyana Housing scam case

The court, however, postponed further proceedings till next week at the request of additional prosecutor general of NAB Imranul Haq who informed the bench that Mr Bharwana was indisposed to turn up.

The court observed that though it was not dictating in the order sheet but NAB should consider making an alternative arrangement, indicating someone else be appointed as the prosecutor.

While adjourning the case, Justice Saeed also said until next hearing the status quo would be maintained, indicating that those on bail would continue enjoying freedom and those in jail would remain incarcerated.

Meanwhile, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) adjourned the hearing of an appeal filed by former prime minister Nawaz Sharif against his conviction in Al-Azizia/Hill Metal Establishment reference at the request of his counsel.

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Momentary relief
Updated 10 May, 2026

Momentary relief

THE IMF’s approval of the latest review of Pakistan’s ongoing Fund programme comes at a moment of growing global...
India’s global shame
10 May, 2026

India’s global shame

INDIA’s rabid streak is at an all-time high. Prejudice is now an organised movement to erase religious freedoms ...
Aurat March restrictions
Updated 10 May, 2026

Aurat March restrictions

The message could not have been clearer: women may gather, but only if they remain politically harmless.
Removing subsidies
Updated 09 May, 2026

Removing subsidies

The government no longer has the budgetary space to continue carrying hundreds of billions of rupees in untargeted subsidies while the power sector itself remains trapped in circular debt, inefficiencies, theft and under-recovery.
Scarred at home
09 May, 2026

Scarred at home

WHEN homes turn violent towards children, the psychosocial damage is lifelong. In Pakistan, parental violence is...
Zionist zealotry
09 May, 2026

Zionist zealotry

BOTH the Israeli military and far-right citizens of the Zionist state have been involved in appalling hate crimes...