APROPOS the editorial ‘CJP Nisar’s legacy (Jan 18). As a member of the three-member committee constituted by the Academic Staff Association of the then University of Islamabad (now Quaid-i-Azam university) to review the University of Islamabad Ordinance, and modify wherever necessary and suggest new Statutes (1972), we had encountered two very interesting questions. One; what is a university and second what is a law for? Of course I am not going to delve upon these two interesting questions but I must say I had learnt a lot while pondering these two questions.

I have come to the conclusion that there have always been two schools of thought about the law, the first one: laws are for the people, the second: people are for laws. I believe CJP Nisar belonged to the first school of thought.

Of course the people, institutions, etc belonging to the second school of thought would like to ruthlessly crush those who belong to the first school of thought.

I, belonging to the first school of thought, admire CJP Nisar’s effort to make people conscious that laws are for people. I am totally against the saying: my law right or wrong, the slogan of second school of thought.

I hope the new CJP will continue with the philosophy of the first school of thought: laws are for people.

Prof Mahboob Mohammad

Karachi

(2)

APROPOS the editorial ‘CJP Nisar’s legacy’ (Jan 18). In my view Justice Nisar went on the populist binge after the Supreme Court gave a weak and unpopular verdict disqualifying Nawaz Sharif.

On the one side Nawaz Sharif had launched a popular tirade against the judgment at political meetings and his party was also following its leader. On the other side Justice Nisar deemed it fit to go on a populist grandstand by overextending Article 184 (3) and transgressing the line between the powers of the executive and the judiciary drawn by the Constitution to restore the public acceptance of the Supreme Court.

Thus his populism should be seen as an unsuccessful strategy and that it was in reaction to the popular movement led by Nawaz Sharif against a controversial judgment given against him.

Babar Ayaz

Karachi

Published in Dawn, January 20th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....
Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...