PESHAWAR: After remaining absconder for around 28 years, accused in the murder case of young journalist Mansoor Ahmad was arrested when his pre-arrest bail plea was turned down by Peshawar district and sessions judge.

Soon after District Judge Mohammad Younas pronounced the order, the personnel of University Campus police took the suspect, Mohammad Sohail, into custody.

Late Mansoor Ahmad, 26, was a special correspondent of The Democrat newspaper. He was attacked at his residence situated at Postal Colony, University of Peshawar. The attackers hit him on his head and threw acid on him during wee hours on June 27, 1990.

He had received serious burns injuries and expired after few days of the occurrence. The then prime minister Benazir Bhutto and chief minister Aftab Sherpao had ordered his treatment abroad. He had expired at Islamabad International Airport before he was shifted to a plane so as to take him to London for specialised treatment.

The attack on Mansoor had triggered widespread protests by journalists across the country and Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists and Khyber Union of Journalists had staged several demonstrations.

A local judicial magistrate had declared Mohammad Sohail a proclaimed offender on June 9, 1996, and issued his perpetual arrest warrants. The suspect remained absconder for over two decades and surfaced few days ago and filed pre-arrest bail petition.

The district judge had earlier granted him interim pre-arrest bail on September 18, but did not confirm the same after completion of arguments by both the parties. The court pronounced that the petitioner did not deserve to be extended the concession of pre-arrest bail.

There were reports that the petitioner had been absconding in Afghanistan.

The local police had also been probing the case to ascertain whether the deceased was killed because of his journalistic work or was having any personal issue with the petitioner.

A panel of lawyers including Syed Abdul Fayyaz, Ali Azeem Afridi and Yousaf Riaz appeared for the deceased’s family and contended that the petitioner had absconded for 28 long years. They said that no mala-fide was pointed out by the petitioner on behalf of the local police or the complainant.

They contended that police were still probing the case which was not possible without the arrest of the accused. They requested the court not to confirm his pre-arrest bail as it would inflict irreparable loss to the prosecution case.

The counsel of the petitioner, Lateef Afridi, contended that there was no evidence against his client to connect him with the commission of the offence.

Published in Dawn, November 21st, 2018

Opinion

Seizing the moment

Seizing the moment

The provinces bear the primary responsibility for improving access to family planning services, particularly for poorer families.

Editorial

PIA privatisation
Updated 11 Jul, 2025

PIA privatisation

While it does give the privatisation authorities a much-needed head-start, it will not be sustainable unless preceded by policy and regulatory reforms.
Beyond expectations
11 Jul, 2025

Beyond expectations

THESE are tough times, but the country is lucky enough to still be considered home by a large expatriate workforce,...
Train in vain
11 Jul, 2025

Train in vain

TALK of ‘revival’ of the long-dead Karachi Circular Railway has turned into a running joke for denizens of this...
No negotiations
10 Jul, 2025

No negotiations

IT seems like the appeal from Kot Lakhpat Jail has fallen on deaf ears. “[…] The time for negotiations has...
Speech policing
Updated 10 Jul, 2025

Speech policing

Sweeping accusations have once more exposed just how broadly and arbitrarily Peca is being applied.
Continued detention
10 Jul, 2025

Continued detention

THE continued detention of BYC head Mahrang Baloch and five other activists indicates that the state is uninterested...