'Shockingly regressive' or 'need of local culture'? Twitter reacts to KP's ban on male MPs in girls' schools

Published October 29, 2018
The KP government has banned the entry of male MPs in girls school functions. — File
The KP government has banned the entry of male MPs in girls school functions. — File

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government on Monday banned the entry of male VIPs into girls schools and directed the schools’ managements to invite only female lawmakers and other role models as chief guests to sports, annual day and other functions.

The decision was defended by KP Chief Minister's Adviser on Education Ziaullah Bangash, who explained that "the culture of this province does not permit males to enter female schools", adding that the government is also barring media coverage of events in such establishments "after receiving complaints from parents".

The new policy polarised social media, with some accusing the KP government of "Talibanisation" and others accepting that the move was imperative to boost girls' access to education in the province.

Ziauddin Yousufzai, father of Nobel laureate and activist for girls' education Malala Yousufzai, was one of those who did not agree with the development. He asked the prime minister: "Is this the change and Naya Pakistan you promised us?"

Not everyone held the same view, however, with one Twitterati claiming that "it's best for society".

Another Twitterati thought the move was akin to telling the girls to "play sports in purdah":

Another begrudgingly admitted that the move, though not ideal, was required to "ensure girls get their right to education".

Another found the ban "unethical and affronting", warning that countries "can never progress, if they treat their women like this".

Some explained that the decision is in line with the culture of the province, and that it would actually help female participation in extracurricular activities.

How do you feel about the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government's move? Leave a comment or use the poll below to share your thoughts on the matter.

Opinion

Geopolitical shift in ME

Geopolitical shift in ME

A prolonged conflict will have far-reaching implications for regional geopolitics, sharpening the divisions among Gulf countries that are directly affected by the tensions.

Editorial

Unyielding stances
Updated 13 May, 2026

Unyielding stances

Every day that passes without clarity on how and when the war will end introduces fresh intensity to the uncertainty roiling global markets and adds to the economic turmoil the world must bear because of it.
Gwadar rising?
13 May, 2026

Gwadar rising?

COULD the Middle East conflict prove to be a boon for the Gwadar port? Islamabad’s push to position Gwadar as a...
Locked in
13 May, 2026

Locked in

THE acquittal of as many as 74 PTI activists by a Peshawar court in a case pertaining to the May 2023 violence is a...
Bannu attack
Updated 12 May, 2026

Bannu attack

The security narrative and strategy of the KP government diverges considerably from the state’s position.
Cotton crisis
12 May, 2026

Cotton crisis

PAKISTAN’S cotton economy is once again facing a crisis that exposes the country’s flawed agricultural and...
Buddhist heritage
12 May, 2026

Buddhist heritage

THE revival of Buddhist chants at the ancient Dharmarajika Stupa in Taxila after nearly 1,500 years is much more ...