Kashmir unrest

Published
5

OVER the past three decades, the struggle for freedom and rights in India-held Kashmir has gone through many phases, sometimes manifesting itself through armed struggle, sometimes through the political process. However, despite the passage of 30 years, the Kashmiris’ disenchantment with Indian rule has grown, and today, one can say with certainty that there is immense public support for fighters taking on New Delhi’s law enforcers in the disputed territory.

The reason for this is not hard to fathom; the Indian government over the years, especially under the BJP’s watch, has adopted a heavy-handed approach towards dissent in Kashmir, and some half a million troops are stationed in the occupied territory. This militarised approach to resolving a political problem has completely failed — protests are increasing as Indian troops and paramilitaries attempt to subdue Kashmiri citizens, smothering them and using brutal tactics to silence them.

As media reports have noted, today Kashmir has seen the rise of a ‘new-age militancy’ whereby tech-savvy fighters active on social media have opened up a new front against India. Young Hizbul Mujahideen fighter Burhan Wani, who was slain by Indian forces in 2016, has become the face of this new rebellion.

It is a fact that now unarmed Kashmiris often come out to defend fighters from being apprehended by Indian forces. Senior Indian officials have admitted on record that public sympathies for fighters are a major challenge that New Delhi has to confront. While the BJP-led government has adopted a tough position on resolving the Kashmir imbroglio, as the writing on the wall has shown, such an approach has failed and will continue to fail as the average Kashmiri is tired of living under the suffocating grip of Indian rule.

In his speech after the elections, incoming prime minister Imran Khan had mentioned the need for better relations with India, and specifically mentioned the Kashmir issue. The Indian establishment should seize the opportunity, shed its rigid stance and talk to Pakistan about Kashmir, with Kashmiris being the third party in this trilateral dialogue.

Repeating nationalistic slogans that Kashmir is an ‘unbreakable part of India’ will do little to quell discontent in the valley. The fact is, Kashmir is a disputed region, and until a practical solution is found that is acceptable to its people, and supported by Islamabad and New Delhi, the vicious cycle of violence and repression in the region will continue. The way to bring calm to held Kashmir is not to crush its people, but to talk to them.

Published in Dawn, August 7th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...