Report finds 456 died in UK hospital by unjustified drug use

Published June 21, 2018
PORTSMOUTH (Britain): Bishop James Jones, who led the Gosport War Memorial Hospital inquiry panel, holds a copy of ‘The Report of the Gosport Independent Panel’, outside the Portsmouth Cathedral on Wednesday.—Reuters
PORTSMOUTH (Britain): Bishop James Jones, who led the Gosport War Memorial Hospital inquiry panel, holds a copy of ‘The Report of the Gosport Independent Panel’, outside the Portsmouth Cathedral on Wednesday.—Reuters

More than 450 patients died prematurely in a British hospital after they were given powerful painkillers for no medical reason in what a damning report found was a “disregard for human life”. An independent panel found that between 1989 and 2000 at the Gosport War Memorial Hospital in southern England, there was an institutionalised regime of prescribing and administering dangerous doses of opioids which were not clinically justified.

“There was a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening the lives of a large number of patients,” the report said, adding that warnings from nurses had been ignored and there had been a failure by police and medical regulators to protect patients. It added: “The families, and indeed the nation as a whole, are entitled to ask how these events could have happened; how the hospital dismissed the nurses’ concerns and subsequently took no action; how the healthcare organisations failed to intervene.”

The 387-page report concluded that 456 patients were given opioids without justification and “probably at least another 200 patients similarly affected but whose clinical notes were not found”. The report noted the Gosport deaths and the concerns raised about them occurred at the same time as it was revealed that British family physician Harold Shipman, dubbed “Dr Death” had been responsible for killing patients in his care with lethal heroin injections. Shipman, convicted in 2000 for murdering 15 patients, killed as many as 250 people in his care according to a later inquiry.

But the panel examining the Gosport scandal said the circumstances were different. “We draw a distinction because Harold Shipman acted alone, apparently, whereas what we are describing to you in this report is an institutionalised practice and that is a significant difference,” Reverend James Jones, the chairman of the independent panel, told reporters.

Published in Dawn, June 21st, 2018

Editorial

Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...
Dangerous law
Updated 17 May, 2024

Dangerous law

It must remember that the same law can be weaponised against it one day, just as Peca was when the PTI took power.
Uncalled for pressure
17 May, 2024

Uncalled for pressure

THE recent press conferences by Senators Faisal Vawda and Talal Chaudhry, where they demanded evidence from judges...
KP tussle
17 May, 2024

KP tussle

THE growing war of words between KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur and Governor Faisal Karim Kundi is affecting...