"The Panama Papers verdict was based on hiding of facts, not on the intent to give false statements," Chief Justice Saqib Nisar remarked on Wednesday while hearing a petition against Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Secretary General Jahangir Tareen.

In July, the apex court had disqualified the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif for failing to declare his iqama and a salary he had received from his son's Dubai-based company.

"We are looking to see if those who hold public office, who govern the country, have engaged in corrupt practices or used their office for their own benefit," said the chief justice while presiding over a three-member bench of the apex court, comprising Justice Faisal Arab and Justice Umar Atta Bandial. "We do not want the sword of disqualification hanging over our parliamentarians."

The petition filed by PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi seeks the disqualification of Tareen and PTI Chief Imran Khan over the alleged non-disclosure of assets, existence of offshore companies, as well as receiving foreign funding for PTI.

During the hearing of the case, Tareen's lawyer, Sikander Mohammad, told the court that Abbasi had filed a petition against Tareen for political reasons, not for the public interest.

Defending his client against the allegation of having loans written off, the lawyer told the court that Tareen had never taken any loans.

"There is no proof that Tareen used his position in the public office to get loans written off," the chief justice observed.

Sikander said that his client had been accused of hiding off-shore companies, making false statements before the Election Commission of Pakistan, getting loans written off and providing incorrect information to the Federal Board of Revenue.

The lawyer said that his client was not the beneficial owner of any off-shore company.

"We should have heard the case against Imran Khan and Jahangir Tareen along with the Panama Papers case," the chief justice remarked during the hearing. "Why were the cases against Khan and Tareen kept separate from the central case?"

The lawyer told the bench that his client's name had not appeared on the Panama Papers list.

The chief justice noted that while it had been reported that 38 hearings of the disqualification case had been held, "nobody talked about the caution and calm with which these hearings were conducted."

"We do not want anybody to be wronged," he added while concluding the hearing.

The next hearing is set to take place tomorrow (Thursday) at 11am.



07 Dec 2021

Losing fiscal discipline

ONE of the several changes proposed in the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act of 2005, seeking major...
07 Dec 2021

Taliban brutality

LAST WEEK, the US, the Western countries and other allies joined hands to condemn the Afghan Taliban for the alleged...
Dangerous justification
Updated 07 Dec 2021

Dangerous justification

AT a time when millions worldwide are consumed with anger and despair over the barbaric lynching of a Sri Lankan...
Who should vote?
06 Dec 2021

Who should vote?

Logistical issues regarding transparency in the casting of votes also require detailed deliberations.
06 Dec 2021

Weak fundamentals

LAST week, Pakistan’s finance chief Shaukat Tarin sought to reassure the markets and people that our economic...
06 Dec 2021

Winter sports potential

FOR a country blessed with three of the world’s most famous mountain ranges, Pakistan has produced precious few...