North Korea crisis

Published September 7, 2017

EVEN the remote prospect of nuclear war is a chilling thought. However, the dangerous escalation between North Korea and the United States — both nuclear-armed states — shows no sign of abating. The root of the conflict lies in the Korean War that ended in 1953, which left the Korean peninsula divided between the communist North and capitalist South. Today, over two decades since the end of the Cold War, the seeds of conflict remain in this troubled peninsula. The latest crisis has been triggered by a series of provocative actions by Pyongyang. Last month, the North threatened to fire missiles at the US Pacific territory of Guam; this was followed by an even more troubling move in late August when Pyongyang fired a ballistic missile over the Japanese island of Hokkaido. On Sunday, the North claimed to have tested a hydrogen bomb. While all these moves by the isolationist regime are indeed troubling, the response of the US — Pyongyang’s primary foe — has hardly been measured. For example, the US president has threatened the North with “fire and fury” should it attack America.

Aside from the fact that the relationship between Pyongyang and Washington has been characterised by decades of mutual hostility, at this time both states are headed by men who regularly indulge in provocative bluster. For example, Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s current strongman, termed his country’s intercontinental ballistic missiles a “gift for the American [expletive]” on America’s independence day. Mr Trump, hardly known for his subtle language, has said that “talking” to the North is not the answer, and that “they only understand one thing” alluding to the use of force. One tends to differ with Mr Trump; talking is indeed the answer to this crisis, as the alternative is far more horrific. Even South Korea, a staunch American ally and the state that arguably has most to lose in case of war, has differed with Washington’s approach and called for “peaceful denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula”. All stakeholders, especially the North and the US, must first stop issuing threats against each other. Second, saner minds on all sides must resist the march towards war. China and Russia have influence over the North, which they should use to urge Pyongyang to climb down. On the other side, cooler minds within the US establishment need to prevent their country from getting involved in another disastrous conflict.

Published in Dawn, September 7th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Unquiet Lebanon
Updated 21 Jun, 2026

Unquiet Lebanon

Either Israel must silence its guns and withdraw from all of Lebanon, or face isolation and boycott from the international community.
Mothers at risk
21 Jun, 2026

Mothers at risk

FOR years, efforts to reduce maternal deaths have focused heavily on postpartum haemorrhage — the severe bleeding...
Political budget
21 Jun, 2026

Political budget

THE KP budget does not read like a document of a province getting its fiscal house in order. Revenue is projected at...
Pakistan’s moment
Updated 20 Jun, 2026

Pakistan’s moment

Pakistan’s diplomats are second to none, and if these states seek to engage this country constructively, a new modus vivendi for the subcontinent can be reached.
Menacing water plans
20 Jun, 2026

Menacing water plans

IN April last year, India suspended the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty, which contains no provision allowing it to...
World Refugee Day
20 Jun, 2026

World Refugee Day

WORLD Refugee Day, observed today around the globe, marks 75 years since the adoption of the 1951 convention ...