Kian D. Delos Santos
Kian D. Delos Santos

The killing of 17-year-old Kian D. Delos Santos has stirred us out of our intimidation-induced stupor and shaken an administration built on fear. From the circumstances of his life (a boy with the simple dream of becoming a policeman) to the circumstances of his death (a cynical, cruel dance of death choreographed by policemen), from the courage of the witnesses (who have taken considerable risks to speak in detail) to the character of his parents (who have spoken boldly and with utmost candour), Kian has struck fear among the very people for whom fear is a strategy.

How do we know this? Because even some of the administration’s stalwart allies have publicly condemned the killing. Because the trolls as well as the blogger-defenders of the administration, after a lull that recalled their studied silence when President Duterte went missing in June, have returned with prepared scripts and attacking themes. Because the police has belatedly sought to paint Kian as a runner in the illegal drugs trade. (The former solicitor general, Florin Hilbay, has a term for what the police are doing: the “After Murder Identification of Suspects.”)

Kian is not the first innocent to die in the human rights catastrophe that is the president’s so-called war on drugs; tragically, he won’t be the last. But his killing disturbed the consciences of many Filipinos (even, as anyone with a social media account knows by now, remorseful Duterte voters) because the circumstances that led to his death were caught on camera.

To my knowledge, none of the senators who voted in favour of a committee report dismissing the existence of extrajudicial killings ever went out at night (when most of the extrajudicial killings happen) to look at the dead bodies that continue to pile up day after violent day. That made it possible to compartmentalise the problem. But the CCTV clip, which shows Kian being led away by non-uniformed men moments before he was shot dead, cannot be wished away.

Recovering from their shock, Duterte supporters are now demonising a mere boy, or inventing stories using their creative imagination, or pre-emptively defending the president from any liability or responsibility — because they suspect the controversy over Kian’s killing can be a tipping point in the supposed ouster plot against the president. As I have written before, I do not believe there is any such plot. But as I have also argued before, the need exists for a countervailing power to check the Duterte administration’s excesses.

Some who have seen the kill list grow have given up on a spineless senate, or a supreme court with a plurality of practical-minded justices, or a professional but distracted military, or a Catholic church without enough courageous pastors worthy of their calling. Kian’s killing has the potential to change all that. That is why the Duterte administration is, as kids say these days, “shookt”.

Its officials know that the battle cry against the dictator Ferdinand Marcos was a series of escalating demands: “Tama na, sobra na, palitan na.” (Enough is enough. This is too much. Replace him.)

I do not think that the momentum of outrage over Kian’s killing — and by extension the thousands of EJKs perpetrated since last year — is enough to bring the country to the third stage. And it isn’t necessary. This administration reads and responds to the surveys, is in fact highly sensitive to public opinion. If public opinion will be galvanised by Kian’s killing, it can create the conditions for countervailing powers to emerge again.

Many of the people I follow on social media are skeptical, to say the least, about the senate majority; they see the resolution to investigate Kian’s killing as a desperate public relations initiative, to distance the senators from the public outrage.

I hold a different view. Without diminishing the majority’s role as enabler or deodorant of state violence, we can hope that Kian’s killing has moved enough of them — or two or three more justices, or the professionals in the military, or more leaders of the Church — to say, Enough. Tama na.

Philippine Daily Inquirer

Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...