HYDERABAD: While law­yers boycotted court work in subordinate judiciary, they appeared in the Hyderabad circuit bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC) where all four judges heard cases as per routine on Tuesday.

High Court Bar Associa­tion (HCBA) general secretary Hameedullah Dahiri met senior judges of the bench to request that the board of cases should be discharged, but he was told that if the court work continued at the principal seat, they would hear cases.

“The judges said they will not pass any adverse order, but if the principal seat is working, they will also hear cases. Therefore, there was no strike at all in the high court and lawyers appeared before the division and single-member benches,” said Mr Dahiri.

HCBA president Ayaz Tunio was not present in the court as according to him he was busy with cardiac surgery of his maternal uncle and was not aware of the strike in the court on Tuesday.

He said he recei­v­ed a message from the Sindh Bar Council (SBC) and talked to the HCBA general secretary.

But the Hyderabad Dist­rict Bar Association (HDBA) observed the strike and according to HDBA president Imdad Unnar and general secretary K.B. Leghari, they held a general body meeting of lawyers against the Lahore incident. “We believe there should be no wukala and judges gardi,” said Leghari.

A meeting of the Barrister Society of Pakistan was held in the wake of the Lahore incident last night.

It adopted a motion moved by barrister Shabbir Shah, condemning storming of the court and observed that there should be no strike in support of hooliganism by lawyers.

Two options were presented in the said motion before the members: whe­ther they condemned storming of the court and opposed the strike or whether they supported lawyers’ conduct and called for strike.

Only one member of the society voted in favour of the conduct of lawyers and called for strike.

Meanwhile, Awami Jam­h­o­ori Party president Ama­n­ullah Shaikh, Abrar Kazi and others in a joint statement on Tuesday condemned the shameful assa­ult in Lahore by lawyers and termed it the worst example of hooliganism against entire judicial system of Pakistan.

They said it was repetition of Justice Sajjad Ali Shah’s infamous episode and dem­an­ded a suo motu action against the lawyers involved.

Published in Dawn, August 23rd, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...
IMF’s projections
Updated 18 Apr, 2024

IMF’s projections

The problems are well-known and the country is aware of what is needed to stabilise the economy; the challenge is follow-through and implementation.
Hepatitis crisis
18 Apr, 2024

Hepatitis crisis

THE sheer scale of the crisis is staggering. A new WHO report flags Pakistan as the country with the highest number...
Never-ending suffering
18 Apr, 2024

Never-ending suffering

OVER the weekend, the world witnessed an intense spectacle when Iran launched its drone-and-missile barrage against...