JIT report not the final word on Panama case, says Asma Jahangir

Published July 11, 2017
The human rights activist says that Supreme Court cannot reach a final verdict based on JIT findings. - File
The human rights activist says that Supreme Court cannot reach a final verdict based on JIT findings. - File

Human rights lawyer and activist Asma Jahangir on Monday said that the Panamagate joint investigation team's (JIT) report cannot be taken as the final word on the Panamagate case.

Speaking in the show Aaj Shahzeb Khanzada Kay Sath, Jahangir said that it is understood that the Supreme Court cannot reach a final verdict based solely on the JIT report. She also said that it is not important for the Supreme Court to agree with JIT's findings.

The human rights activist said that since Article 10(a) is now part of the Constitution, it means that there will be a trial. Article 10(a) gives citizens of Pakistan the right to free trial.

"Now the question is where will the Supreme Court send it for trial. If it is held in an apex court, there will be no time for appeal," she said.

She further said that since the JIT was controversial, it will not be fair to take its report as the final word.

"It was being said that JIT will not be able to work until Nawaz Sharif resigns," Jahangir recalled. "But they have, as you said, submitted a damning report."

She, however, criticised the courts for not taking note of Sharif family's financial irregularities earlier.

"If they committed any financial crimes, courts should have stepped in then instead of waiting for Panama Papers to be released."

"The media was constantly creating the impression of [the government being] a mafia. These claims have made the JIT controversial," she added.

In an interview with Newsweek Pakistan, Jahangir claimed that the Supreme Court has not "thought [the matter] through legally".

"This [JIT report] is the equivalent of a police investigation and people cannot be convicted after a police investigation," she insisted. "However, they can be accused or fined."

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.