VIENNA: The expropriation of Adolf Hitler’s birthplace by Austria’s government is unconstitutional and is not the only way to stop it being an attraction for neo-Nazis, a lawyer for its former owner told a court on Thursday.
Gerlinde Pommer-Angloher filed a legal challenge to the constitutional court in January, seeking annulment of a law which allowed the state to seize the three-storey house in Braunau am Inn on Austria’s border with Germany.
The state took possession of the house under a compulsory purchase order after a parliament vote, saying it wanted to stop it becoming a shrine for neo-Nazis to visit.
The fact that the house is still a meeting point for neo-Nazis more than 70 years after World War Two had nothing to do with its former owner, Pommer-Angloher’s lawyer Gerhard Lebitsch said at court hearing on Thursday.
“Mrs. Pommer-Angloher has always had an interest in a neutral use of the house,” Lebitsch said. “She thinks that nothing is achieved with the expropriation.” Instead, police, security services and the judiciary could do a better job to prevent it becoming a site for neo-Nazi tourism, he said.
Austria’s government says expropriation was the only way to end a long-running dispute with Pommer-Angloher. Retired without children, she has turned down previous offers by the state to convert or buy the house.
Published in Dawn, June 23rd, 2017
Dear visitor, the comments section is undergoing an overhaul and will return soon.