WASHINGTON: Immigration to the United States has come in swells and dips over the past two-plus centuries, driven by shifts in US policy, the mood in the country and world events. Labour shortages, racial tension, economic forces, religious prejudice and national security concerns all fit into the picture.

“Here we are, the United States, a nation of nations, with the iconic symbol of the Statue of Liberty, and yet we are still arguing about the peopling of America,” says American University historian Alan Kraut. “We are constantly in a tension between, on the one hand, a desire to be altruistic and the desire to serve our national interests.”

In the modern era, the foreign-born share of the US population hit a low of 4.7 per cent in 1970. It’s now near historic highs, hitting 13.5 per cent in 2015.

At times welcoming, at times restrictive, immigration laws have helped shape the complexion of an increasingly diverse nation.

As President Donald Trump moves on building a border wall and considers restricting refugee flows, a look at the waves of immigration that have helped to determine the nation’s identity:

Colonial welcome wagon

The US has been regulating immigration since not long after it won independence from Britain, according to a paper by the Pew Research Center’s D’Vera Cohn.

A 1790 law limited citizenship to “free white persons” of “good moral character” who had lived in the US for at least two years. A series of laws in 1798 tacked on some strict enforcement provisions, including a requirement that non-citizens live in the US for 14 years before naturalisation. Some portions of the law were repealed in 1802 and others expired.

Overall, though, for its first 100 years, “the United States facilitated immigration, welcoming foreigners to a vast country”, Philip Martin, a professor emeritus at the University of California, Davis, wrote in a paper for the Population Reference Bureau.

For many of those years, it brought in slaves, too, treating them as property, not citizens. In 1870, people of African origin gained citizenship rights.

Fleeing famine, seeking gold

The years from 1820-1870 saw an influx of newcomers from northern and western Europe, mostly German and Irish, providing needed labour. About a third came from famine-wracked Ireland, stoking anti-Catholic sentiments.

The gold rush and jobs on the transcontinental railway also attracted Chinese immigrants, generating economic and racial resentments.

Starting in 1875, the US began imposing restrictions on the types of immigrants it would allow. Among those banned: “criminals, people with contagious diseases, polygamists, anarchists, beggars and importers of prostitutes”, according to Cohn. A series of laws also put growing restrictions on immigrants from China, and even provided for the deportation of Chinese nationals already in the US. Later laws barred immigration from most Asian countries.

Kraut says the push-pull between the need for more labourers and the tensions that immigration stirred led to a common expression: “America beckons, but Americans repel.”

Another European wave

Between 1881 and 1920, more than 23 million people came to the US, mostly from southern and eastern Europe, aided by cheaper transatlantic travel and attracted by employers seeking workers. Around the globe, in a period of industrialisation and easier travel, “there were more people on the move than at any other time in human history,” says Kraut.

Then came the Great Depression and more restrictive laws, sending US immigration into a long, steady decline. Laws enacted in 1921 and 1924 for the first time set quotas based on nationality. In 1920, immigrants made up 13.2 per cent of the population. In 1970, the number bottomed out at 4.7 per cent.

Family plan

In 1965, immigration policy underwent a dramatic shift from a quota-based system to one that favoured the entry of people who already had relatives in the US or had skills needed by employers. Since the enactment then of the Immigration and Nationality Act, immigration has been dominated by people from Asia and Latin America rather than Europe, according to Pew’s Cohn.

Once the 1965 law kicked in, immigration started growing, with the immigrant population reaching 43.3 million people in 2015. Where were all those immigrants from? The Americas, 53 per cent; Asia, 30.6 per cent; Europe, 11.1 per cent; Africa, 4.8 per cent, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

The architecture of the 1965 law still undergirds the US immigration system. But changes in 1986 and 1996 that dealt with rising concerns about illegal immigration and terrorism are notable: The first legalised about 2.7 million immigrants living in the US illegally (most of them from Mexico and Central America) and tried to crack down on the hiring of people in the country illegally, with poor results. The second expanded reasons for deporting people or ruling them ineligible to come to the US, and gave state and local police power to enforce immigration laws.

The years since the 9/11 attacks of 2001 have brought laws to broaden terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and deportation.

And now, President Donald Trump’s focus on building a wall at the US-Mexican border and his consideration of a plan to suspend the US programme for admitting refugees show there is still plenty of tension at the intersection of illegal immigration and national security.—AP

Published in Dawn, January 27th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Updated 21 May, 2022

Band-aid measure

A more pronounced impact would have been possible had the cap on energy prices been removed.
21 May, 2022

Bilawal’s defence

BILAWAL Bhutto-Zardari’s robust defence at the UN headquarters of former prime minister Imran Khan’s Feb 24 trip...
21 May, 2022

Yasin Malik’s conviction

THE conviction of veteran Kashmiri freedom fighter and head of the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front Yasin Malik by an...
Updated 20 May, 2022

TTP peace talks

ANOTHER attempt to sue for peace with the outlawed TTP is being made, again facilitated by the Afghan Taliban that...
20 May, 2022

Beyond the law

THE senior judiciary should take care not to overreach in its zeal to ‘fix’ issues it ideally need not worry...
20 May, 2022

Political musical chairs

YET another political crisis is brewing in Balochistan, where old rivals Jam Kamal Khan Alyani and Sardar Yar...