Rights activist killed

Published May 10, 2016

THE authorities are never averse to trotting out statistics that purport to illustrate the success of the ongoing operation to rid Karachi of criminal/terrorist elements.

The murder of rights activist and blogger Khurram Zaki on Saturday night exposes the hollowness of those claims.

It was a wearyingly familiar modus operandi: armed men on motorbikes targeted the activist as he sat with a couple of friends at a roadside café in North Karachi.

He died almost immediately in the hail of bullets while his companions were wounded, one of them critically.

On Sunday afternoon, a large number of Khurram Zaki’s friends and family, as well as members of civil society — particularly those belonging to Shia organisations — took his coffin to a brief protest sit-in before the Sindh chief minister’s house.

The FIR, registered under sections of the Pakistan Penal Code pertaining to murder and abetment as well as Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, names two clerics, Lal Masjid’s Abdul Aziz and the leader of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat’s Karachi chapter Aurangzeb Farooqui, as the perpetrators.

While it may be premature to definitively hold any specific individuals responsible for the attack, it is clear that Pakistan, in particular Karachi, remains a dangerous place for anyone speaking out against religious extremism or in propagation of the values of tolerance and inclusiveness.

Zaki was known to be a fearless and passionate defender of religious freedom, and he did not mince his words against those he perceived as primary actors in the country’s drift towards radicalism.

His death, coming almost exactly a year after the murder of the well-known rights activist, Sabeen Mahmud, is disturbing evidence of the enormity of the task that lies before this society.

No number of ‘intelligence-based operations’ will break this vicious cycle of bloodletting unless the very seeds of intolerance are rendered sterile. That requires a level of introspection that is ruthless in its thoroughness. Do we as a society have the stomach for it?

Published in Dawn, May 10th, 2016

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
Updated 20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

True de-escalation means Israel must start behaving like a normal state, not a rogue nation that threatens the entire region.
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...