LAHORE: Speakers at a press conference held by Women Action Forum at the press club on Tuesday dilated upon the Punjab Protection of Violence against Women Bill 2016.

The panel included human rights lawyer Hina Jilani, sociologist Fareeda Shaheed and Nabiha Meher Sheikh. The topic was introduced by Gulnar Tabassum from Shirkatgah.

Hina Jilani began saying that women had always been the ones to end up fighting for their own rights and they had achieved a lot over the decades ‘not because of the government but in spite of the government.’ Concerning the bill, she said though it was positive enough that the step to promulgate such a set of laws was being taken, the fact was that it was also disappointing in a way because so many loopholes were present in the law that it became difficult to assess the level of justice that would be served to the victim.

“First it’s important to note that the initiative was taken in Sindh and Balochistan and at that time no one said a word. But the problem came when the Punjab Assembly began to launch it. The bills in Sindh and Balochistan are far better than the one introduced here,” she said.

“Article 25 points to equal protection for all in front of the state, but unfortunately in some districts women will be much safer than in others.

“At the time a woman registers a complaint according to the law the authorities should have the equipment and tools to help her immediately, but this is not happening,” she said. The biggest point that she raised was that the law had not criminalised domestic violence unlike Sindh and Balochistan assemblies.

She demanded that those in charge of the law should review it once again before implementing it.Meanwhile, Nabiha Meher said there was mention of cyber harassment and that this should be clarified as there were no laws passed on cyber crime.

The WAF members also demanded that all paralegal systems should be completely abolished whether military, religious or non-formal, but in particular, military courts, anti-terrorism courts, Council of Islamic Ideology (CII), the Federal Shariat Court, jirgas, panchayats, musalhati committees.

The WAF demanded the rescinding of the Qisas and Diyat law which undermined justice.

Published in Dawn, March 9th, 2016

Opinion

A crisis of trust?

A crisis of trust?

Most damaging fallout of the constant demonisation of opponents by political leaders is erosion of public trust in politicians.

Editorial

An unseemly dispute
08 Aug, 2022

An unseemly dispute

THERE is clarity, but perhaps not of the kind that Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial hoped to achieve when...
Unfair on taxpayers
Updated 08 Aug, 2022

Unfair on taxpayers

Unfair move has drawn valid criticism as it coincides with drastic increase in income tax on salaried people and corporates.
Polio nightmare
08 Aug, 2022

Polio nightmare

AS if the resurgence of polio in southern KP were not enough, officials and international monitoring bodies must now...
Political stunt
Updated 07 Aug, 2022

Political stunt

The former PM is attempting to make a very expensive point with his decision to contest all 9 NA seats going up for by-election.
Monsoon emergency
07 Aug, 2022

Monsoon emergency

AS another wet weather system has entered Pakistan, and the federal government has declared a “monsoon...
Taliban’s denial
07 Aug, 2022

Taliban’s denial

THE Afghan Taliban’s recent statement denying any knowledge of the now deceased Al Qaeda chief Ayman...