I hope none of the women were scarified for the man's sins.

In a country where laws exist for everything, why do we need these Jirgas?. How many systems of justice are we going to have?. What if someone is not happy with the decision of the Jirga?. Can they appeal?. Sounds like 16th century!!.

The jirga system is an old and traditional way of resolving the disputes. The judiciary should not get embarrassed and nor consider it as a parallel system of justice, as the people themselves prefer to get their issues and disputes out of the court of law. The best way is to give legal cover to this traditional way of resolving the disputes by adopting a judicious approach by way of making it conditional with the consent of the competent court.

@Khalid: You seems to be unaware about the procedure of local and traditional jirga and consider that the Sardar can make any decision out of his choice. Before making such comments, I suggest you to attend one of the jirga's personally then I am sure you will be convinced that system of resolving disputes one sitting is better than hundred sittings of the normal justice procedure. Sardar, who makes rapprochement, is nominated with the mutual consent of the aggrieved parties, but then condition applies that the decision 'FAISALA' of Sardar would be a binding on both sides, and the guarantees are given by the chieftain of each tribe. There is a complete procedure and the decisions are made in accordance with the laid-down traditional practices.

Jirgas??/ In sindh??? I'm totally shocked. What are the courts for.