ISLAMABAD: The witnesses in Lahore's Zain murder case retracted their statements after receiving money from the accused, Additional Advocate General (AAG) Punjab Razzaq A Mirza told the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

A three-member bench headed by Justice Amir Hani Muslim commenced suo motu hearing about the acquittal of the accused in the murder case today.

AAG Mirza informed the court that the provincial government would file a petition against the acquittal of the five accused.

During the hearing, Justice Manzoor Ahmed Malik asked the prosecutor why the witnesses had retracted their statements in the case.

The Punjab prosecutor replied that many of the witnesses are property dealers who withdrew their statements after receiving money from the accused.

Also read: Zain murder case: Another witness refuses to identify Kanju

Justice Sardar Tariq Masood asked if evidence against the accused existed which could lead to their sentence. He also asked why the statements of the witnesses were not recorded under Article 164.

The prosecutor replied that evidence is present under which the accused could be sentenced.

The court summoned relatives and prosecution witnesses in the next hearing and directed Inspector General Punjab to present the relatives and witnesses under security. The hearing was subsequently adjourned to Nov 16.

Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali had in October taken suo motu notice of acquittal of Mustafa Kanju, son of former minister of state Siddique Kanju, by a Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court in Zain murder case.

The Supreme Court had summoned record of the case from the trial court on Oct 30. The record was provided to the apex court.

But they were acquitted of all charges by ATC-I Presiding Judge Muhammad Qasim on Oct 28 because of lack of evidence, although the trial court had indicted them for killing 16-year-old Zain and injuring Husain, 18.

Know more: Zain murder case: Kanju, his guards acquitted

As per the prosecution, Kanju was allegedly drunk when his luxury car hit another car driven by a woman, who was never identified by the investigators. It said Kanju got infuriated and opened fire at his opponent party. However, the woman had already driven away from the scene and Zain and Husain, the passers-by, were hit by the firing.

Zain succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital. Kanju had escaped from the scene and later was arrested from Khushab.

Gulberg police had lodged FIR against Kanju and his guards under section 7-ATA and section 302 of PPC. In this case, the prosecution had also filed a petition before the Lahore High Court with a request to transfer the trial to some other judge expressing distrust of the incumbent.

The ATC later released the accused after they submitted an application under Section 265-K of the Criminal Procedure Code as the complainant and all prosecution witnesses had not testified against them.

Also read: A case for strong witness protection laws in Pakistan

Opinion

Editorial

Growth to stability
Updated 29 Apr, 2026

Growth to stability

THE State Bank’s decision to raise its key policy rate by 100 basis points to 11.5pc signals a shift in priorities...
Constitutional order
29 Apr, 2026

Constitutional order

FOLLOWING the passage of the 26th and 27th Amendments, in 2024 and 2025 respectively, jurists and members of the...
Protecting childhood
29 Apr, 2026

Protecting childhood

AN important victory for child protection was secured on Monday with the Punjab Assembly’s passage of the Child...
Unlearnt lessons
Updated 28 Apr, 2026

Unlearnt lessons

THE US is undoubtedly the world’s top military and economic power at this time. Yet as the Iran quagmire has ...
Solar vision?
28 Apr, 2026

Solar vision?

THE recent imposition of certain regulatory requirements for small-scale solar systems, followed by the reversal of...
Breaking malaria’s grip
28 Apr, 2026

Breaking malaria’s grip

FOR the first time in decades, defeating malaria in our lifetime is possible, according to WHO. Yet in Pakistan,...