LHC orders cantonment polls on party basis

Published March 31, 2015
Lahore High Court declares non-party local government elections being held in cantonment areas as unconstitutional. — AFP/File
Lahore High Court declares non-party local government elections being held in cantonment areas as unconstitutional. — AFP/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has declared that non-party local government elections being held in cantonment areas are unconstitutional and asked the Election Commission to hold the polls on party basis.

In a short order issued on Monday on several petitions, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah ruled: “Sections 14 and 61 of Cantonment Local Government (Elections) Ordinance, 2002 are struck down as being ultra vires to Article 17(2) of the Constitution.”

The judge relied on several reported judgments of superior courts, including the Pakistan People’s Party vs Government of Punjab and others (PLD 2014 Lahore 330), and Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif vs President of Pakistan and others (PLD 1993 Supreme Court 473).

He ordered the federal government and the ECP to issue directives to returning officers to accept nomination papers on party basis by Tuesday in accordance with the election schedule notified on March 20.

The candidates who had already filed their nomination papers would have the facility to revise them and indicate their political party, if any, the order said.

Justice Shah also said the elections for the cantonment local governments should be held as scheduled.

The petitions were filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s Punjab leaders, Advocate Azhar Siddique, Advocate Ramzan Chaudhry, Advocate Fayaz Ahmad Mehar and others.

They pleaded that the Sections 14 and 61 of the 2002 Ordinance denied political identity to elected representatives of local governments. They said that without such an identity, the capacity of an elected representative to assess and express preferences for policymaking and executive action was greatly impaired. The petitioners asked the court to declare the non-party elections unconstitutional and strike down the impugned provisions of the ordinance for being contrary to fundamental rights.

Published in Dawn, March 31st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

IMF’s unease
Updated 24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

It is clear that the next phase of economic stabilisation will be very tough for most of the population.
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...
Energy inflation
Updated 23 May, 2024

Energy inflation

The widening gap between the haves and have-nots is already tearing apart Pakistan’s social fabric.
Culture of violence
23 May, 2024

Culture of violence

WHILE political differences are part of the democratic process, there can be no justification for such disagreements...
Flooding threats
23 May, 2024

Flooding threats

WITH temperatures in GB and KP forecasted to be four to six degrees higher than normal this week, the threat of...