Ali Zafar is a senior lawyer of the Supreme Court of Pakistan who has argued several high-profile cases before the apex court in recent years. Son of leading constitutional expert S.M. Zafar, Mr Zafar has considerable experience arguing in the courtroom of former chief justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry. Dawn spoke to him about the defamation suit filed by the former chief justice against Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan.

Is there any precedence in the judicial history of Pakistan that a former Chief Justice of Pakistan or a retired judge of the Supreme Court has ever sued a head of a political party by instituting a damages suit?

I have never come across any such instance. This is probably the first time in our judicial history that a defamation notice has been served upon the leader of a political party by a former chief justice of the highest court in the land.

If the matter goes to court, does that bode well for the former chief justice?

One can never say for sure. I have personally seen a number of cases remain pending for ten years or more before different district courts in various cities of the country. There are scores of defamation suits against private television channels, but none of the cases has reached its conclusion. Normally, such cases drag on for years.

But since a former chief justice is involved this time, the case may be expedited and decided in time.

If the litigation really does go through, I do not see it to be smooth sailing for the former chief justice because the onus to prove that Imran Khan had maligned and hurt his reputation would be squarely upon the former chief justice. He may even have to stand in the witness box during the course of the trial, where he will definitely also be cross examined by the defendant’s counsel.

What do you think justice Chaudhry’s intention is in filing this suit?

The former chief justice, from what it seems, wants to get his position vindicated. In Pakistan, defamation suits are usually used as a threat to silence one’s opponents and not really to recover damages or secure financial benefits.

One also can’t be sure what position Imran Khan will take during these proceedings because he has not shown all his cards and can go to any extent to prove his allegations.

In case Imran Khan succeeds in establishing his allegations, this will cease to be a trial of Imran Khan and become a trial of the former chief justice and his character. It will then be the former chief justice in the dock defending himself. The judiciary as an institution will be weakened by this and will be the ultimate loser.

Published in Dawn, July 25th , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Cipher acquittal
Updated 04 Jun, 2024

Cipher acquittal

Our state, in its desperation to victimise another ex-PM, once again left them looking like more of a hero than they perhaps deserved to be.
China sojourn
04 Jun, 2024

China sojourn

AS the prime minister begins his five-day visit to China today, investment — particularly to reinvigorate the...
Measles resurgence
04 Jun, 2024

Measles resurgence

THE alarming rise in measles cases across Pakistan signals a burgeoning public health crisis that demands immediate...
Large projects again?
Updated 03 Jun, 2024

Large projects again?

Government must focus on debt sustainability by curtailing its spending and mobilising more resources.
Local power
03 Jun, 2024

Local power

A SIGNIFICANT policy paper was recently debated at an HRCP gathering, calling for the constitutional protection of...
Child-friendly courts
03 Jun, 2024

Child-friendly courts

IN a country where the child rights debate has been a belated one, it is heartening to note that a recent Supreme...