IG FC responsible for production of missing persons, says SC

Published December 11, 2013
Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File photo
Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Wednesday recorded its verdict over the Balochistan missing persons case and ordered for the production of missing persons in front of the Director General of Criminal Investigation Department (CID), DawnNews reported.

The apex court bench held Inspector General of Frontier Corps Maj Gen Ijaz Shahid responsible for the production of the missing persons during the hearing of a contempt of court notice against the IG FC for defying the court's order by not appearing for the proceedings of a case relating to missing persons from Balochistan province.

Acting inspector general of the FC, Brigadier Khalid Naseem, appeared in the apex court, whereas the court sought the issuance of the notification pertaining to the posting of Brigadier Khalid Naseem at as the acting IGFC and the date at which the missing persons would be produced.

The order recorder by the court said that heirs of the missing persons were facing hardships whereas law enforcement agencies could do nothing about it.

The court also segregated the IG FC contempt case from the Balochistan law and order case proceedings and adjourned the next hearing until December 19.

Last week was the first time that a chief of the FC was issued a contempt of court notice. The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Shahid that he may face contempt charges if he failed to appear before it on Dec 5.

Maj-Gen Shahid was required to attend the Dec 5 proceedings to justify why FC personnel allegedly involved in enforced disappearances did not appear before the Crime Investigation Department of Balochistan despite a clear court order.

The court had also rejected a request by Advocate Irfan Qadir who tried to appear on behalf of the FC inspector general and had stated that unless the officer obeyed the order no concession could be extended to him.

The contempt notice was issued under Article 204 of the Constitution, read with Section 17(1 and 3) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003, authorising the court to proceed against a person by framing contempt charges after a preliminary hearing.

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...