Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Pervez Musharraf — File photo
Pervez Musharraf — File photo

ISLAMABAD: A local court in Islamabad on Friday adjourned the hearing of the bail plea filed by former dictator Pervez Musharraf in a case relating to the killing of Lal Masjid cleric Ghazi Abdul Rasheed to Nov 4. Moreover, the former president's trial in the case was postponed to Nov 11.

Islamabad's additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) Wajid Ali heard Musharraf's bail application without arriving at a resolution.

During the hearing, Tariq Asad, the counsel of the complainant, Haroon Rasheed, and a representative of the Lal Masjid Shuhada Foundation, alleged that the police had destroyed all the evidence and subsequently declared Musharraf ‘innocent’ in the murder of Ghazi Abdul Rasheed.

Asad said he wanted to provide more evidence before the court, adding that a case "as important as this" should not be handled in a roughshod manner.

The counsel further requested the court to postpone its decision on the former military ruler's bail plea so that he may present more evidence before it.

Asad referred to the statement of an additional witness, saying he wanted to present his arguments on that.

Musharraf's counsel, Ilyas Siddiqui, on the other hand requested the court to decide on the bail plea today and said his client should not suffer on account of the lack of preparation on part of the complainant's lawyer.

The court subsequently adjourned the hearing of the bail plea to Nov 4.

Moreover, Musharraf's trial hearing was also postponed to Nov 11 when the judge said he had not received a notification for the former president's jail trial.

The judge said the jail trial could not commence until a notification was received in this respect.

Musharraf was booked in the murder case of Lal Masjid cleric Ghazi Abdul Rasheed on Sept 2 after Haroon Rasheed, the cleric’s son, approached the IHC for registering an FIR against the former dictator for launching the 2007 operation. During the operation, 102 people – 10 army men, one Rangers official, three civilians and 88 people inside the mosque – had died.

Musharraf seized power in a 1999 coup but was forced into exile nine years later after a showdown with the judiciary. He returned to Pakistan this year to contest May elections but was barred from contesting by a flurry of court cases.

He is also embroiled in four other cases: the assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, the murder of Baloch nationalist leader Nawab Akbar Bugti, the detention of deposed Supreme Court judges and the declaration of emergency on Nov 3, 2007.

Comments (7) Closed

Abid Mohiuddin Nov 01, 2013 12:31pm

What a non sense .How more could be a joke of the court who first reserved the judgement till today and then stated hearing the case today. I think they should be fired for their incompetency for the sake of the honor of the courts

Nadeem Chaudhry Nov 01, 2013 01:50pm

..............the drama continues !

Oz Nov 01, 2013 01:54pm

Where is this country going ?

The man - Ghazi - was not a cleric! A cleric is a man of high religious knowledge and does not resort to extremist actions against innocent people.

In the Lal Masjid opertaion, the first hit was from Ghazis men, who were armed with heavy weapons in the madrassa. What the hell were heavy weapons doing there ? How were his men able to kill army officers and jawans ? There were women who claimed to have been held hostage by him in a compound as a human shield.

Shame on this system - its about time the youth of this country come out of their somber and get rid of all the corrupt, be that the civil services, govt or judiciary - get them out before its too late.

Dr Qureshi Nov 01, 2013 02:57pm

If the police has declared Musharraf innocent and no evidence against him, why is he still being held ? If Police are not going charge him why is not free ? This seems like a case of Judicial Terrorism.

S.A.Khan Nov 01, 2013 04:27pm

1.In the absence of evidence supposedly destroyed by the Police Musharraf should be allowed bail.

  1. Police to explain if allegation of destruction of evidence has any merit
Aslam Nov 01, 2013 07:56pm

Justice delayed equal to Justice denied.

unbelievable Nov 01, 2013 09:10pm

alleged that the police had destroyed all the evidence and subsequently declared Musharraf