Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File photo
Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: A contempt of court petition was filed in the Supreme Court on Monday over the writing of a letter to a law firm by the government of former premier Raja Pervez Ashraf.

The existence of the letter became public last week when Attorney General Munir A Malik informed the Supreme Court that although the previous PPP government had written a letter to the Swiss authorities in compliance with the court order on the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) case, it also sent a second secret communication to a law firm requesting for an official confirmation about the Swiss authorities’ inability to revive $60 million graft cases against the president.

Today’s petition, filed in the apex court by Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi, stated that the communication made to the law firm was tantamount to committing contempt of court.

The petition added that the purpose of the second letter was the obstruction of justice and requested to make President Asif Ali Zardari, former prime minister Raja Pervez Ashraf, former law minister Farooq H Naek and former foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khar party to the case. The petitioner further requested the court to order the inclusion of their names to the Exit Control List (ECL).

The allegedly secret letter was written to Dr Nicholas Jeanding of law firm Fontanetassocies Geneva by former law secretary retired Justice Yasmin Abbasey on November 22 last year, Malik had revealed before a three-judge bench which had taken up the NRO implementation case.

Dr Jeanding had been asked to explain to the attorney general of Geneva about the position of the Pakistan government that the order of closing the cases by the former attorney general on August 25, 2008, had attained finality and could not be reopened under the Swiss law.

The apex court was further surprised when Malik informed it that the secret communication was missing from the official record of the law ministry.

The secret letter

The secret letter came to light when Pakistan’s Ambassador in Berne (Switzerland) Mohammad Saleem sent a fax message on June 18 to the law secretary forwarding a letter of June 13 along with enclosures received from Dr Jeanding relating to the SGS/Cotecna money laundering case.

The ambassador was requested to send fax copies of all correspondences because the relevant files directly related to the subject were not traceable in the law ministry.

The second letter addressed to Dr Jeanding through the ambassador by the former law secretary stated that President Zardari enjoyed complete and absolute protection and immunity under Article 248(2) of the Constitution as well as the international law, which was neither being waived nor lifted.

Dr Jeanding was also instructed to explain to the AG Geneva about the position of Pakistan that the requests for mutual legal assistance made in 1997 by then chairman of Ehtesab Bureau Saifur Rehman and attorney general late Chaudhry Mohammad Farooq were illegal and had no legal effect and hereby withdrawn by the Pakistan government and might be treated as never written.

Comments (8) Closed

Fida Ahmed Advocate Jul 01, 2013 01:52pm

Unless and until the country's law of the land gains enough strength to treat the poor and the rich equally I have a real fear and doubt about its survival.

Purush Jul 01, 2013 03:09pm

There should be no dispute that it is indeed a contempt of Court and that too Supreme court. It is time these big families of the region are taken to task and made to realise they are not above law.

Bilal Jul 01, 2013 05:11pm

I don't have a legal background but I fail to understand the rationale of having the case pursued against our own President in a foreign court. In case the evidence is substantial and the crime punishable, the same can be meted out on Mr. Zardari by our own courts. Will some legal expert shed light on this dichotomy?

waseem Jul 01, 2013 05:51pm

Dear Dawn,

What is the purpose of posting this picture of supreme court every time. ??? Why you want to present a negative image of Pakistan in every news ?

zehri Jul 01, 2013 06:31pm

at least once the supreme corut should take a bold step by punishing all whose nams mentioned above including yaseem abbasi ----

Muhammad Farooq Jul 01, 2013 06:38pm

And they expect common man to be law-abiding!

Musa Jul 01, 2013 08:07pm


malick Jul 01, 2013 11:02pm
  1. Why the law secretary retired justice Yasmeen is not made party?
  2. If second letter is contempt of court involved persons must be punished according to law.
  3. If second letter is not contempt of court then the same punishment should be given to PM, law minister, foreign minister, attorney general Munir A Malik and to petitioner Naqvi some extra to stop such games of tit for tats, wasting of public money and wastage of court time.