ISLAMABAD, Aug 8: Justice Riaz Ahmed Khan of Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday sought reply from the additional district magistrate of Islamabad by Friday on a petition filed against the detention of kidnapping suspects after their acquittal from the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC).

Basharatullah Khan, the counsel for three suspects, Qari Abdul Malik, Sibghatullah Mawiya and Khurram Abbasi, told the court that the ATC judge, Ch Habibur Rehman on August 4 acquitted them in the case of kidnapping of inspector Rana Pervez and patwari Arshad Mehmood because the prosecution could not produce tangible evidence against them.

He said the Adiala jail authorities instead of releasing the three acquitted persons kept them detained in the jail because the same day additional district magistrate Islamabad had issued their detention order for a period of seven days.

The detention order being issued under Section 3 of Maintenance of Peace Ordinance (MPO) expressed apprehensions of the reunion of the acquitted persons with the proscribed organisation, adding that the release of the suspects would put the peace of federal capital at stake.

Advocate Khan contended that additional district magistrate was not authorised to issue such detention order as a competent court after examining the evidence has acquitted the suspects.

He expressed the possibility that the acquitted suspects would become missing persons if the court did not intervene into this matter.

Justice Khan remarked that it was next to impossible as the court had taken notice of this matter. He directed the additional district magistrate to submit reply and adjourned the hearing till Friday.

As per detail of the case, Inspector Pervez and patwari Mehmood had gone missing from Tarnol on December 3, 2010.

According to the investigation, the kidnappers wanted to kidnap a property dealer Rana Sadique, a brother of Pervez, for ransom. The kidnappers set up an appointment with him on the pretext of wanting to buy property.

However, Sadique could not make it to the appointed meeting and instead sent inspector Pervez. Pervez asked the ‘prospective buyers’ to meet him at his house, in sector G-8/4 from where they all left together to see the property in Tarnol.

On the way, they also picked up the patwari. No one has since seen the inspector or the patwari.

On December 20, 2010, three suspects were picked up when they arrived at Chungi No26, to collect the ransom that the patwari’s family had agreed to pay.

Opinion

Editorial

Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....
Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...