Conflict of interests

Published November 26, 2015

I WAS amused to read the remarks of Dr Arif Alvi in an article on True Worth Foundation, published in your paper on Nov 21, in which he was quoted as having hinted that taking $ 70,000 worth of medical equipment from the Japanese government by this welfare organisation being run by a member of the parliament, resulted in a conflict of interest.

Surely, he would not be unaware that the general secretary of his own party, while serving as a minister in Musharraf’s cabinet, had received massive funds for his organisation, called Ali Tareen Foundation, from many foreign countries and donors, including reportedly $1.1m from the World Bank, $10m from the Japan Social Development Fund (JWFD) and $40m from USAID. Mr Tareen apparently also received funds from UK aid and Plan International (both INGOs).

I am sure Mr Tareen did a fabulous job with these funds. Does Dr Alvi see any conflict of interest in this case?

Asif Ahmed Ali

Faisalabad

Published in Dawn, November 26th, 2015

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...