Housewife starts a revolution!

Published March 26, 2007

NEW YORK, March 25: The New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristoff who single handedly made Mukhtaran Mai a household name in the United States, has now taken up the cause of Begum Amina Masood Janjua whose husband disappeared two years ago, allegedly picked up by Pakistani security agents.

In an op-ed article titled ‘The General and the Housewife,’ Kristoff asserts “General Musharraf is facing angry street demonstrations around the country in the most serious crisis of his presidency –and that’s partly because he picked a fight with a middle-class housewife who is proving tougher and shrewder than he is.”

While saying it’s impossible to predict the outcome of the demonstration and unrest in Pakistan, he believes that behind it all is the saga of Begum Janjua who is desperately trying to find her husband.

“The nation is ready to rise up, there’s revolution behind me,” Begum Janjua told Kristoff.

In the column, Kristoff writes that the disappearances in the wake of the war on terror, Musharraf “began using the war as a cover to eliminate troublesome nationalities, religious activists and human rights organisers.”

Kristoff says: “Mrs. Janjua’s husband Masood Janjua may have been picked up because of ties to a Muslim organisation, but there is no indication he had broken any law.”

Despite assurances from President Musharraf, Masood Janjua was not found so Mrs. Janjua –who Kristoff quotes as saying “from the queen of my house to a leader of revolution” – she sued the government over the disappearances. “To everyone’s astonishment, the Pakistani supreme court took up the case and ordered the government to account for those who are missing,” says Kristoff.

Mr. Kristoff also asks “Where is the US? Noting that the Bush administration has stuck more solidly with Mr. Musharraf (“a solid friend” is the current State Department formulation) than with its principles. President Bush needs to make clear that US sides with Pakistan’s democratic future, not its autocratic past.”

Not mincing any words Mr. Kristoff notes: “Mr. Musharraf’s contribution to Pakistan are enormous—he rescued Pakistan’s economy, fostered seven per cent growth rates, promoting education, nurtured the expanding middle class. But those same accomplishments are now raising aspirations for genuine democracy rather than sham he offers.”

However, he warns that General Musharraf’s replacement could be worse, noting that Pakistan has been one of the worst-ruled nations over the last 50 years and Mr. Musharraf is better than his predecessors.”

Opinion

Editorial

Exit strategy
Updated 18 Mar, 2026

Exit strategy

MOST members of the international community, particularly states in the greater Middle East, are gravely concerned...
Unsafe trains
18 Mar, 2026

Unsafe trains

SUNDAY’S accident involving the Shalimar Express has once again brought into sharp focus the deep structural and...
Disappointment in Dhaka
18 Mar, 2026

Disappointment in Dhaka

FOR a side looking for lift-off after a disappointing T20 World Cup, it was despair for Shaheen Shah Afridi’s ...
Missing in action
17 Mar, 2026

Missing in action

NOT exactly known for playing a proactive role in protecting the interests of Muslim nations and populations...
Risk to stability
Updated 17 Mar, 2026

Risk to stability

THE risks to Pakistan’s fragile economic recovery from the US-Israel war on Iran cannot be dismissed. Yet the...
Enrolment push
17 Mar, 2026

Enrolment push

THE federal government has embarked upon the welcome initiative to enrol 25,000 out-of-school children in Islamabad...