Former President Pervez Musharraf and his wife Sehba Musharraf.—File Photo

ISLAMABAD The Supreme Court was requested on Monday to overturn its judgment validating the Nov 3, 2007, emergency rule in the Tikka Iqbal Mohammad case and order placing the name of former president Pervez Musharraf on the exit control list (ECL) by booking him in a treason case for abrogating the Constitution and damaging the judiciary.

Advocate Fazal Ellahi Siddiqui, who moved the petition under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on fundamental rights, also accuses former chief justice Abdul Hameed Dogar and 43 other judges of aiding and abetting the subversion of the Constitution by taking oath under the Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) after the proclamation of Nov 3 emergency.

This is the third such petition filed in the apex court after reinstatement of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry. In earlier petitions, Advocate Nadeem Malik and Advocate Nadeem Ahmed sought that contempt of court proceedings be initiated against the judges who took oath under the PCO and the verdict in the Tikka Iqbal case be declared null and void.

Former president Musharraf, President Asif Ali Zardari, the army chief, former chief justice Dogar and Justice (retd) Mohammad Nawaz Abbasi are respondents in Advcate Ellahi's petition.

The petition said it had become a common phenomenon that the army intervened after every eight to 10 years, amended the Constitution to suit its needs and eventually to get its acts of omissions and commissions validated by the courts and parliament.

'The military commanders consider that the public will weep and wail for a few days (on military intervention), but after that they have to reconcile to the fait accompli,' the petition said.

The Americans, like in Musharraf's time, have also been given a free hand by President Zardari and fundamental rights of the people are being violated daily in tribal areas and Dir, Swat and Chitral. A large number of people have migrated from these areas and suffered tremendous losses with no hope of returning to their homes because of US drone attacks, but the government is sitting as a silent spectator.'

The petition contended that the act of former president Musharraf to wrest powers of the judiciary was indeed an act of high treason to serve US and British interests.

It said that the judges who had taken oath under the PCO had also committed the grave crime of subverting the Constitution and, therefore, deserved to be dealt with under Article 6 (high treason) of the Constitution and punished under Section 2 of Act No LXVIII of 1973 as High Treason (Punishment) Act of 1973.

Opinion

Editorial

Collective security
Updated 12 Mar, 2026

Collective security

Regional states need to sit down and talk. They must also pledge and work towards collective security.
Spectrum leap
12 Mar, 2026

Spectrum leap

THE sale of 480 MHz of fifth-generation telecom spectrum for $507m is a major milestone in Pakistan’s digital...
Toxic fallout
12 Mar, 2026

Toxic fallout

WARS can leave environmental scars that remain long after the fighting is over. The strikes on Iran’s oil...
Token austerity
Updated 11 Mar, 2026

Token austerity

The ‘austerity’ measures are a ritualistic response to public anger rather than a sincere attempt to reform state spending.
Lebanon on fire
11 Mar, 2026

Lebanon on fire

WHILE the entire Gulf region has become an active warzone, repercussions of this conflict have spread to the...
Canine crisis
11 Mar, 2026

Canine crisis

KARACHI’S stray dog crisis requires urgent attention. Feral canines can cause serious and lasting physical and...