Step aside, please

Published October 6, 2009

Racial and religious profiling at airports or during the visa process has become an experience thousands of Pakistanis – or South Asians for that matter, share. But it doesn’t end there. Unfortunately, the unfair and often baseless treatment extends over to foreign students, artists and professionals residing in the western countries as well.

The 12 Pakistani students who were arrested in UK and then deported were labelled as ‘security risk’. If no charges were brought up against them, how was it established that they were posing a risk? Was being Pakistani enough to justify this suspicion? Whether or not other South Asian regions admit it, it is very often heard how someone accused of a crime abroad is labelled as a ‘Paki’ despite belonging to neighbouring countries.

Unlike local residents, if foreign nationals are suspected of a crime but then released based on no evidence, instead of walking out free, quite often they are deported to their native country.

Similarly, Mohammed Haneef, a doctor practising in Australia was arrested for providing support to a terrorist organisation but after four weeks in custody, was released. Haneef’s arrest was a mistake but that didn’t stop the authorities from cancelling his work visa and eventually causing him to return to India.

Arrests based on religious affiliation, 'suspicious name' or a certain demographic have become extremely common now. Lengthy and often intensive screening of Muslim or South Asian travellers in general is also continuously being perpetuated. Rohinton Mistry, the renowned Canadian author had cancelled his book tour in the US for this reason alone. It was stated that as a ‘person of colour’ he was repeatedly stopped at US airports and decided to go no further to avoid this humiliation.

Our own prominent social worker Abdul Sattar Edhi has been detained three times at US airports despite his humanitarian work being known worldwide.

These laws were put in place for security reasons after 9/11 and no doubt they may have averted some serious potential damage but do they really have to be applied so hastily? Why isn’t the same treatment not extended to Arab countries then? How many visas have been rejected on baseless claims of suspicion about the traveller’s intentions?

Perhaps the International Olympic Committee might have picked up on this too, as one IOC member from Pakistan asked what it would be like for foreigners, including athletes from countries such as ours or Iraq, to enter the US if Chicago were to win the Olympic hosting race.

If you were hoping for change, then look around. Based on the unjustified rejection of visas, harassment at airports and intensified screening going on today, can South Asian travellers hope for a difference? Will the leaders of the Western countries act upon their rhetoric about understanding the Muslim world or should we give up hoping for fair treatment when entering another country?

Shyema Sajjad is the Desk Editor at Dawn.com

Opinion

Editorial

More pledges
Updated 25 May, 2024

More pledges

There needs to be continuity in economic policies, while development must be focused on bringing prosperity to the masses.
Pemra overreach
25 May, 2024

Pemra overreach

IT seems, at best, a misguided measure and, at worst, an attempt to abuse regulatory power to silence the media. A...
Enduring threat
25 May, 2024

Enduring threat

THE death this week of journalist Nasrullah Gadani, who succumbed to injuries after being attacked by gunmen, is yet...
IMF’s unease
Updated 24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

It is clear that the next phase of economic stabilisation will be very tough for most of the population.
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...