Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


Targeting the farmers

Published Apr 14, 2013 08:42am


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

-Photo by APP

HYDERABAD: The agriculture sector has attracted the attention of all the major parties as they got down to the preparation of their respective election manifestos. The PPP, for instance, seeks to modernise agriculture and enhance production under the proposed ‘People’s Agriculture Programme’ to ensure five per cent growth rate in the sector as against the current 3.1 per cent.

The party has vowed to line all water channels which, if implemented, would undoubtedly be a major initiative.

The PML-N has resolves to turn agriculture into a fully-viable economic industry by changing the policy framework and terms of trade. Besides, it would seek parliamentary approval for adding a new article to the Constitution to make ‘Right to Food’ a fundamental right of every citizen within a reasonable timeframe.

The PTI has committed to allocate 65 per cent of ADP funds for agricultural and rural development. Like the other two parties, it has also discussed irrigation and land reforms while promising to monitor the ownership of the distributed state land and to ensure credit and agriculture support services for the farmers.

In theory, the manifestos are comprehensive as far as agriculture is concerned. The implementation part is something that is making the stakeholders to, at best, adopt a wait-and-see approach.

“The manifestoes look good, but I don’t know how the parties plan to arrange credit for the farmers. The Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (ZTBL) only makes up for only eight per cent of the loans at present,” argued Mehmood Nawaz Shah, General Secretary of the Sindh Abadgar Board. He said the agrarian economy stands at $50 billion and the sector needs an explanation how the parties will ensure credit through the private sector,” he said.

He was, however, appreciative of PPP’s commitment towards land reforms the People’s Agriculture Programme, which would encourage export-oriented crops. Another aspect of the PPP manifesto that impressed Shah was the livestock revenue enhancement plan under which women from selected rural households will be provided with requisite livestock resources to earn a sustainable income. “This is something really encouraging for rural women, provided it is implemented properly,” he added.

Nabi Bux Sathio, General Secretary of the Sindh Chamber of Agriculture, was critical of the fact that the PPP had promised flat rate for tube-wells but it had itself discontinued its application three years ago. He appreciated the party’s resolve that it would line water channels, which, he said, would ensure water conservation.

Sathio is impressed by PTI’s manifesto which promises 65 per cent of ADP allocations for agriculture and rural development. However, he opposed the proposal of “price fixation of irrigation water”, arguing that not all farmers use laser levelling which is an expensive option. Instead, he supported PPP’s proposal related to solar-powered tube-wells and better support price for wheat, cotton, sugarcane and rice.

Sathio said that revitalising corporate farming would only benefit the managers of cooperatives and not small growers, calling the PML-N plans vague.

According to Nadeem Shah, a progressive farmer, PPP had repeated itself in terms of promises, while the PML-N didn’t come up with any fresh idea either. It is the PTI proposal of ensuring a balance between the cost of production and the price of crop that seemed to have satisfied him the most. “It is a reasonable commitment,” Shah said.

The PTI manifesto has also made a major pledge to introduce “a nationwide crop and livestock insurance scheme”, which may have positive implications in the wake of floods that have visited Sindh in recent years.

PML-N in the only party, however, that has directly addressed the issue of natural disasters, setting a target of prioritising routes destroyed by such calamities and building villages in all disaster zones.

Surprisingly, no party has even once mentioned the drainage sector which matters the most in the development of farmlands. In Sindh’s context, it attains significance as the province serves to take the entire drainage of upcountry to the sea through two different drainages. One of them, the Right Bank Outfall Drain (RBOD) lies incomplete even after a decade, while the Left Bank Outfall Drain (LBOD) has been a disaster in itself.

Comments (2) Closed

Tariq Apr 14, 2013 01:55pm
While the PPP and PML-N they make promise at election time but once they get into power they forget their pledges! Yet the same people look at their "old parties and consider their same promises again". What good are hollow promises no matter how grand they may be if they fail to "deliverer" then why not give the new party a chance to see if they will keep their pledges. What have to loose? Oh and please do not sell your vote a plate of biryanie your vote is priceless!
KhanChangezKhan Apr 15, 2013 06:49am
I agree with your comments. We should never go for vote to them who have been several times in power. The over-flown their own reserves flushing out the reserves of our country. This is the right time to bring a change otherwise we will never been able to bring out our country from crises. Your votes should go to one to whom even you don't know but not to them who have tested several times. They have only promises and nothing in practical. These robbers have taken away all of our assets and finance into their own custody. Sometime they are announcing in their election campaign that they did this and that for the people, yes they might did something but by which resources, from our own funds and not from their own pockets. Whatever they did, either Motor ways, Fly-overs, Modern Transport systems, distribution of laptop, distribution of funds in the name of Benazir Income scheme, etc., etc., from the public funds and in return they took at least 60% of the budgeted schemes as commission or by iregularization and fraudelent of funds.