NEW YORK, Nov 5: Israel’s hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered security forces to prepare for an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2010, but his military chief and head of the intelligence agency refused to follow orders, calling the move “illegal” and akin to “stealing a war”.

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak was part of the plan.

Citing an investigative report by an Israeli channel, The New York Times said on Monday that the military chief and the top spy of Israel vehemently opposed the move that could have brought the two countries on the verge of war.

At the end of a meeting of the forum of seven senior government ministers in 2010, which the then Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and former Mossad chief Meir Dagan attended, Netanyahu gave an order to raise the level of preparation of Israel's security apparatus to prepare for a military strike.

The Times said the report, by the respected investigative journalist Ilana Dayan, came in the form of a promotional preview for an hour-long documentary about Israel’s decision-making process regarding Iran. Ms Dayan said Netanyahu, in a meeting with a small circle of top ministers, turned to Gabi Ashkenazi and told him to “set the systems for P-plus,” a term meaning that an operation would start soon.

The investigation by the Channel 2 programme Uvda (Fact), Dagan came out sharply against the attack on Iran telling Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak, “You are likely to make an illegal decision to go to war. Only the cabinet is authorised to decide this.”

Meanwhile, associates of Ashkenazi reportedly said the former Israel Defence Forces (IDF) chief was concerned that raising the alert level would “create new facts on the ground”, leading to a war.

Barak in an interview to the channel said that Ashkenazi responded to Netanyahu at the time saying that the IDF was not ready and that he did not have the operational capacity to carry out the order.

The Defence Minister claims in the interview that in contrast to Ashkenazi and Dagan's positions, raising the alert level to “P Plus” does not necessarily entail going to war.

“The things that you are describing are the responsibility of the government. The idea that if the (IDF) chief of staff does not recommend something that is possible to do, then we cannot decide to carry it out as this has no basis in fact,” he said.

Opinion

Editorial

Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.
Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....