Umpire Daryl Harper and India's captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni in Kingston, Jamaica.—AP

SYDNEY: Retired Australian umpire Daryl Harper has accused cricket authorities of being too lenient on India's player and claimed their captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni had put undue pressure on him in last month's Jamaica test, local media reported on Friday.

The 59-year-old, who opted against standing in his scheduled farewell test between India and West Indies in Dominica following “unfair criticism” of his performance in Jamaica, believes the International Cricket Council (ICC) employed double standards.

“When I need to consider which team is playing and apply the laws differently for different teams, then this game has lost sight of its standards and its values,” Harper was quoted as saying in the Australian newspaper on Friday.

He wondered how Dhoni escaped without punishment despite publicly criticising umpiring decisions in the Sabina Park test which India won by 63 runs.

“I waited for a response or some action from management...and I waited. No response came... no support, no action. This wasn't the first time that I felt that I had been left out on a limb.

“People don't always think before they speak. Some spontaneous comments can be harmful to the game and its best interests. I had previously imagined that was the reason for a clause in the ICC Code of Conduct about 'inappropriate public comment'.”

Harper, who officiated in 95 test and 174 one-day internationals, claimed Dhoni pressured him in Jamaica after he had ordered pacer Praveen Kumar out of attack for running on the pitch.

“The Indian captain had the temerity to say, 'We've had issues with you before, Daryl'.

“I didn't ask him to elaborate but I'm still puzzled as to what those issues may have been.”

Harper, who was dropped from the elite panel in May, said he was not convinced of ICC's support.

“After I had informed them of my decision, there was a brief media release announcing that they had 'every faith' in me to finish the job, but I hadn't seen or felt any of this faith, especially in what has turned out to be the final two years of my career.”

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...