US may lose peace in winning

Published November 11, 2001

MOSCOW: America’s use of massive military force in Afghanistan could win the war but lose the peace, the former Soviet defence minister who withdrew Moscow’s troops from the Asian nation said on Friday.

“If you carry out carpet bombing as the Americans are doing now you can win, but what will be left? You could destroy the entire population,” Dmitry Yazov said.

“The Americans don’t understand that by fighting Osama bin Laden, they are provoking the wrath of the whole Afghan population,” Yazov said in a rare interview. “You can have a military breakthrough but lose politically.”

Yazov, 78, was Mikhail Gorbachev’s defence minister in 1989 when the Soviet Union pulled out from Afghanistan after a nine-year war. The top-ranking Soviet marshal later broke with Gorbachev and backed a failed coup against him in August 1991.

The United States has bombed Afghanistan heavily in its fight against the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, whom they blame for the World Trade Centre attack. Washington says its bombing is carefully aimed at military targets.

Yazov said Washington could outdo Soviet military efforts in Afghanistan because Moscow held back from all-out war.

“Do you really think that having defeated Germany, Japan, practically every European government, we could not deal with Afghanistan?” he said. “If we had done everything correctly we should have not gone in at all. But once we had intervened, we should have acted more decisively. We didn’t try to win. We wanted to help, but not everyone accepted our help so we left.

Yazov played a central role in the Soviets’ Afghan war that badly strained relations with the West. He was military commander for the neighbouring Central Asia Soviet states early in the war and then served as defence minister from 1987-91.

Although he still describes the invasion as an intervention at Kabul’s request — the official Soviet line — Yazov said Moscow badly misjudged the struggle for Afghan hearts and minds. The lesson serves as a warning to the United States today.

“The main lesson was that the Afghan people did not support the presence of Soviet forces, although they welcomed material help,” Yazov said. “We were uninvited guests and we our presence did not cement society but divided it instead. We didn’t understand what Islam and religion was, and who really was in charge of the villages, the local Muslims.”

The Soviet pullout opened the way for the Taliban’s rise and the growth of Osama’s influence. But their embrace of terrorism stemmed from a business rather than a religious need, Yazov argues.

“To protect their narco-business, they started to create terrorist organisations. The main goal for the terrorists was to earn money through the drugs trade,” he said. —Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

WHILE launching the Economic Survey 2026, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told a hopeful story of economic...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...