THE economic case for global action to stop the destruction of the natural world is even more powerful than the argument for tackling climate change, a report for the United Nations will declare later this year.

The Stern report on climate change, which was prepared for the UK Treasury and published in 2006, famously stated that the cost of limiting climate change would be about one to two per cent of annual global wealth, but the longer-term economic benefits would be five-20 times that figure.

The UN's biodiversity report — dubbed the Stern for Nature — is expected to say that the value of saving “natural goods and services”, such as pollination, medicines, fertile soils, clean air and water, will be even higher, between 10 and 100 times the cost of saving the habitats and species that provide them.

The report will advocate massive changes to the way the global economy is run so that it factors in the value of the natural world. The measures it will recommend include

— Paying communities to conserve nature rather than deplete it

— Giving strict limits to companies on what they can take from the environment and fining or taxing more to limit over-exploitation

— Asking businesses and national governments to publish accounts for their use of natural and human capital alongside their financial results

— Reforming subsidies worth more than $1tr a year for industries such as agriculture, fisheries, energy and transport.

The potential economic benefits of protecting biodiversity are huge. Setting up and running a comprehensive network of protected areas would cost $45bn a year globally, according to one estimate, but the benefits of preservation within these zones would be worth $4-5tr a year.

“We need a sea-change in human thinking and attitudes towards nature,” said the report's author, the economist Pavan Sukhdev, who is a former senior banker with Deutsche Bank and a special adviser to the UN environment programme.

He called for nature to be seen “not as something to be vanquished, conquered, but rather something to be cherished and lived within”.

The UN report's authors go further with their warning on biodiversity, by saying if the goods and services provided by the natural world are not valued and factored into the global economic system, the environment will become more fragile.

— The Guardian, London

Opinion

Editorial

Trump in Beijing
Updated 14 May, 2026

Trump in Beijing

China is no longer just a rising economic power.
Growing numbers
14 May, 2026

Growing numbers

FORWARD-looking nations do not just celebrate their advantages; they turn them into tangible gains. They also ...
No culling
14 May, 2026

No culling

CRUELTY implies an administrative failure to adopt humane solutions. Despite the Lahore High Court’s orders to use...
Unyielding stances
Updated 13 May, 2026

Unyielding stances

Every day that passes without clarity on how and when the war will end introduces fresh intensity to the uncertainty roiling global markets and adds to the economic turmoil the world must bear because of it.
Gwadar rising?
13 May, 2026

Gwadar rising?

COULD the Middle East conflict prove to be a boon for the Gwadar port? Islamabad’s push to position Gwadar as a...
Locked in
13 May, 2026

Locked in

THE acquittal of as many as 74 PTI activists by a Peshawar court in a case pertaining to the May 2023 violence is a...