THE economic case for global action to stop the destruction of the natural world is even more powerful than the argument for tackling climate change, a report for the United Nations will declare later this year.

The Stern report on climate change, which was prepared for the UK Treasury and published in 2006, famously stated that the cost of limiting climate change would be about one to two per cent of annual global wealth, but the longer-term economic benefits would be five-20 times that figure.

The UN's biodiversity report — dubbed the Stern for Nature — is expected to say that the value of saving “natural goods and services”, such as pollination, medicines, fertile soils, clean air and water, will be even higher, between 10 and 100 times the cost of saving the habitats and species that provide them.

The report will advocate massive changes to the way the global economy is run so that it factors in the value of the natural world. The measures it will recommend include

— Paying communities to conserve nature rather than deplete it

— Giving strict limits to companies on what they can take from the environment and fining or taxing more to limit over-exploitation

— Asking businesses and national governments to publish accounts for their use of natural and human capital alongside their financial results

— Reforming subsidies worth more than $1tr a year for industries such as agriculture, fisheries, energy and transport.

The potential economic benefits of protecting biodiversity are huge. Setting up and running a comprehensive network of protected areas would cost $45bn a year globally, according to one estimate, but the benefits of preservation within these zones would be worth $4-5tr a year.

“We need a sea-change in human thinking and attitudes towards nature,” said the report's author, the economist Pavan Sukhdev, who is a former senior banker with Deutsche Bank and a special adviser to the UN environment programme.

He called for nature to be seen “not as something to be vanquished, conquered, but rather something to be cherished and lived within”.

The UN report's authors go further with their warning on biodiversity, by saying if the goods and services provided by the natural world are not valued and factored into the global economic system, the environment will become more fragile.

— The Guardian, London

Opinion

Editorial

Price bombs
17 Jun, 2024

Price bombs

THERE was a time not too long ago when the faces we see sitting in government today would cry themselves hoarse over...
Palestine’s plight
Updated 17 Jun, 2024

Palestine’s plight

While the faithful across the world are celebrating with their families, thousands of Palestinian children have either been orphaned, or themselves been killed by the Israeli aggressors.
Profiting off denied visas
17 Jun, 2024

Profiting off denied visas

IT is no secret that visa applications to the UK and Schengen countries come at a high cost. But recent published...
After the deluge
Updated 16 Jun, 2024

After the deluge

There was a lack of mental fortitude in the loss against India while against US, the team lost all control and displayed a lack of cohesion and synergy.
Fugue state
16 Jun, 2024

Fugue state

WITH its founder in jail these days, it seems nearly impossible to figure out what the PTI actually wants. On one...
Sindh budget
16 Jun, 2024

Sindh budget

SINDH’S Rs3.06tr budget for the upcoming financial year is a combination of populist interventions, attempts to...