Perfume-makers annoyed

Published August 12, 2002

PARIS: The European Union wants perfume makers to reveal the exact contents of their fragrances in order to alert consumers who might be allergic to some ingredients, but French producers think the idea stinks.

In June, the European Parliament approved a directive aimed at banning the sale of cosmetics tested on animals, but the draft included a clause requiring fragrance makers to print the components of their scents on the bottle.

The move is aimed at helping allergy sufferers to choose aromas that will not cause them harm, but Han-Paul Bodifiee, head of the perfume trade union Prodarom, said the move would only benefit fragrance copycats.

“This requirement is unrealistic, as between 100 and 150 different elements are needed to create a fragrance,” Bodifiee said. “But even worse, it would be suicide for producers as it would make it easier for counterfeiters.”

Brussels has singled out 26 substances that could cause allergic reactions among perfume wearers, 16 of which are natural, such as lavender, lemon, orange or rose extracts.

But Bodifee insisted that listing ingredients on perfume bottle labels was unnecessary, as the amount of each one contained in the fragrance was not enough to make the wearer ill.

“We’re going to provide proof that in 90 per cent of all perfumes, the mixture of these natural essences is not enough to spark an allergic reaction,” he explained.

According to the union leader, only one in every 25,000 people are allergic to fragrances.

And according to one industry analyst, banning natural substances from perfumes contradicts the “Heritage 2” programme, a European initiative aimed at developing the use of natural aromas in perfumes rather than synthetic odours.

But cosmetics firms are not taking any chances: Bodifiee said that several have already asked producers to eliminate substances included on the Brussels allergy hit list, or limit the amount of each used.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...