Forum opposes free trade in America

Published February 6, 2002

PORTO ALEGRE (Brazil), Feb 5: Thousands of people marched through Porto Alegre, Brazil, on Monday to protest a proposal for pan-American free trade as activists accused the United States of not playing by its own rules when it comes to international commerce.

The sea of red flags was the last scheduled show of popular strength at this year’s World Social Forum, which kicked off on Jan. 31 to coincide with the World Economic Forum in New York where world business and political leaders met.

The Brazil event began with a massive peace march and hosted a demonstration of solidarity with economically troubled Argentina. It will end on Tuesday.

Waving Mexico’s red, white and green flag, Alejandro Villamar said if anyone should know about the dangers of free trade, it is Mexicans, who have been part of the North American Free Trade Agreement with the United States and Canada since 1993.

The proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas would basically extend that down through to Argentina.

“FTAA is a superclone of NAFTA and we don’t want our Latin American brothers to suffer the same as the Mexican people,” Villamar, who is part of a 50-person delegation from Mexico at the forum, said in between chanting anti-U.S. slogans.

Caught in the world economic downturn, the Mexican economy is expected to have contracted in 2001. But it was surging before then, growing a robust 6.9 percent in 2000 in large part thanks to its exports to the United States.

But Villamar, who works for the Mexican Network for Action Against Free Trade, says that growth did not filter down to Mexico’s masses and that there is more poverty now than there was before the trade act.

Up the column of protesters, Peter Rosset of the California-based Institute for Food and Development Policy is one of the few Americans at the march. He agrees with Villamar.

“Somewhere between 25 and 60 percent — depending on whose figures you believe — of small and medium business (in Mexico) have gone bankrupt as a result of NAFTA. What this shows is a delinking between economic growth and peoples’ living standards,” he said.

Earlier in the day, a panel of grass-roots activists accused the United States of urging other countries to open their borders to U.S. products while keeping its own doors closed.

“They talk of liberalization when it is we that have to liberalize and they that are protected,” said Roberto Bissio of Uruguayan group Social Watch.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...