PESHAWAR, May 23: A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court on Thursday admitted to full hearing a bail application of former NWFP chief minister Aftab Ahmed Khan Sherpao.

The bench, comprising Justice Nasirul Mulk and Justice Tallat Qayyum Qureshi, issued a notice to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) for the next date to be fixed later.

Advocate Zaffar Abbas Zaidi, appearing before the court for the applicant, contended that there was only one case, pertaining to Ring Road land acquisition, pending against his client. He said his client was only a co-accused in the case and was not directly related to the commission of that offence.

Before the former CM was arrested in January this year on his return from the United Kingdom, he had been facing a sentence of three years in absentia and four cases had been pending against him — Ring Road land acquisition, illegal appointments in education department, Hayatabad plots and illegal exit from the country.

The high court had earlier accepted his appeal against the sentence of three years while in the cases of illegal appointment and Hayatabad plots, he was acquitted by accountability courts. Sherpao was allowed bail in the case of illegal exit from the country by the court of a judicial magistrate.

The only case pending against him is of Ring Road land acquisition. Earlier, he had filed application under section 265-K of the Criminal Procedure Code for his acquittal before the conclusion of the trial, but the accountability court had dismissed that application following which he filed the instant bail application before the high court.

APPLICATION ADMITTED: A two-member bench of the high court admitted to  full  hearing a bail application of a former chief officer of district council, Haripur, Syed Anwar Badshah, and issued a notice to the NAB.

The applicant was arrested on Jan 1 by the NAB on charge of possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income. He was accused of possessing assets to the tune of Rs14.3 million.

The applicant’s counsel contended that there was no evidence against the applicant. He added that he possessed entire details of the assets  attributed to him, which had not been acquired through corruption.

Opinion

Editorial

On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....
Iran stalemate
Updated 02 May, 2026

Iran stalemate

THE US and Iran are currently somewhere between war and peace. While a tenuous ceasefire — extended largely due to...
Tax shortfall
02 May, 2026

Tax shortfall

THE Rs684bn shortfall in tax collection during the first 10 months of the fiscal year is a continuation of a...
Teaching inclusion
02 May, 2026

Teaching inclusion

DISCRIMINATORY and exclusionary content in Punjab’s textbooks has been flagged in Inclusive Education for a United...