WASHINGTON, Aug 20: A nuclear energy deal between the United States and India could fuel an arms race with Pakistan unless it is amended to ensure New Delhi is banned from producing new weapons-grade material and from conducting nuclear test explosions, two US lawmakers said on Wednesday.

The two lawmakers called on the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group to insist on amending the agreement when it meets to consider the deal on Thursday in Vienna.

Objections by any nation in the group — which controls the global flow of civilian atomic exports — would scuttle the pact.

The nuclear energy pact “threatens to rapidly accelerate New Delhi’s arms race with Pakistan — a rivalry made all the more precarious by the resignation on Tuesday of the Pakistani president, Pervez Musharraf,” Democrats Edward Markey and Ellen Tauscher wrote in a commentary published in the New York Times.

“This deal was foolish when Pakistan was relatively stable; with Mr. Musharraf gone, an arms race on the subcontinent would likely be more difficult to control.” The suppliers group “can say yes to nuclear trade with India if two simple conditions are met,” wrote the two members of the House of Representatives.

“First, India must sign the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, a step already taken by 178 other countries and every member state of the Nuclear Suppliers Group,” the commentary said.

“Second, India must agree to halt production of nuclear material for weapons.” Such a ban would not require India to give up the atomic weapons it has or prevent it from building more weapons with nuclear material previously produced, according to the lawmakers.

By shutting down the manufacture of new plutonium and highly enriched uranium, India “would prove to the international community that opening up nuclear commerce would not assist, either directly or indirectly, its nuclear weapons program.

Markey, from Massachusetts, is co-chairman of the House Bipartisan Task Force on Nonproliferation and Tauscher, from California, is chair of the House Strategic Forces Subcommittee.

President George Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh agreed a framework for the nuclear deal in 2005, under which the United States will provide energy-starved India civilian nuclear fuel and technology.

India still needs a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group and ratification by the US Congress before the deal can go through.

The United States and other developed states suspended nuclear trade with India after New Delhi fired its first nuclear weapons test in 1974, and the new deal is part of a strategic partnership between the world’s two biggest democracies.

The commentary said the Nuclear Suppliers Group was formed in response to India’s illegal 1974 nuclear test and that it would be undermining its mission if it approved the deal as written.

If the group agrees to the deal as is and breaches its own rules, “countries such as Iran and North Korea would certainly use the precedent to their advantage.”

—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...