MOSCOW, March 5: Russia's bomber force would have no trouble destroying planned US missile defence sites in Europe, its head said on Monday as the country's security council warned of new policies to counter Nato.

“Since the components of the anti-missile defence system are weakly protected, all types of our aircraft are capable of using electronic countermeasures against them and physically destroying them,” Interfax news agency quoted Lieutenant General Igor Khvorov as saying.

The Kremlin has fiercely protested US plans to install an anti-missile system in Poland and the Czech Republic. Washington insists it would not be aimed at Russia but designed to counter attacks from countries such as Iran and North Korea.

Khvorov also said Russia is modernising its fleet of Tu-160 strategic bombers, with two updated versions of the aircraft expected to be ready this year.

Known as Blackjack to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, the Tu-160 is a highly manoeuvrable supersonic strategic bomber.

Meanwhile, the national security council said Russia is to adopt a new military doctrine in response to the “strengthening” of Nato forces, in the latest sign of worsening relations between the two sides.

“The analysis of the international situation shows that recourse to military force is increasingly the policy of leading world states,” the council said in an announcement that the new doctrine was in preparation.

“The military policy of the principal countries devotes more and more energy to the modernisation of the armed forces,” including updating their weapons technology and strategies, it said.

“Military alliances are strengthening, and especially Nato,” the Russian security council claimed.

“Armed forces are being used above all as a principal instrument for pursuing the economic and political interests of countries” in the West, it said.

The council statement echoed hard-hitting speeches by Russian President Vladimir Putin last month.

In Moscow on Feb 22 Putin warned, “We are encountering a dangerous disdain for international law, ambitions to use military force to achieve personal interests,” in what appeared to be a veiled reference to the United States.

His comments came less than two weeks after he made a full-frontal assault on US foreign policy in a speech in Munich, saying the United States had “overstepped its borders in all spheres.”—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...