No French troops for S. Afghanistan

Published September 22, 2006

PARIS, Sept 21: France will not send troops to help the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) in southern Afghanistan because it has its hands full in Kabul, Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie said on Thursday.

Nato’s top commander of operations, James Jones, has requested up to 2,500 extra troops to combat fiercer-than-expected Taliban resistance in the south before the onset of winter in coming weeks.

Some analysts had speculated that France might help but Alliot-Marie told RFI radio that the French were already stretched leading the command of forces in Kabul.

“Today, the situation in Kabul is stabilised but extremely fragile,” she said when asked if France was ready to offer up more troops to Afghanistan.

“We are mobilising all of our forces there. There is no question that we can take some of our forces away from Kabul to send them to the south of Afghanistan.”

Alliot-Marie said France, which has some 2,000 troops in Afghanistan under different operations, was also participating in missions in countries like Ivory Coast and Lebanon.

“I think other countries, which are maybe less engaged, have possibilities to participate in this reinforcement,” she said.

Poland said last week it would send 1,000 more troops early next year. Romania said on Monday it would send 200 troops to the south next month.

British, Dutch and Canadian soldiers are leading an alliance push into the south, the most lawless part of Afghanistan.

NATO nations have around 18,500 troops in Afghanistan with other non-NATO countries contributing a further 1,500 to its International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

NO REDUCTION: The United States has no plans to reduce US forces in Afghanistan before early next year, the US commander there said on Thursday after acknowledging that the Taliban are fighting harder than expected.

Lt Gen Karl Eikenberry, the commander of US forces in Afghanistan, said the troop levels, now at about 21,000, will be reassessed in February when a new US commander assumes the lead of a NATO force responsible for the entire country.

“But we see steady state through early next year and then military commanders making recommendations to General (John) Abizaid and secretary of defense (Donald Rumsfeld) about any adjustments,” Gen Eikenberry said.

The general’s assessment at a press conference here means that the stretched US grounds forces can expect no immediate relief.—Reuters/AFP

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...