Israeli leaders divided

Published August 13, 2006

Jerusalem: A UN resolution calling for an end to fighting between Israel and Hezbollah has exposed faultlines in Israel, with some politicians welcoming the move but the army saying it will pursue its offensive nonetheless.

The differing reactions in part reflect the military’s desire to register territorial and tactical successes against the Lebanese guerrilla group before the month-long campaign is formally brought to an end by a full ceasefire.

But they also reflect something of the indecisiveness which political commentators and the Israeli public say has shadowed the war and led to calls for Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to go.

Israel’s top commander, Lieutenant General Dan Halutz, said on Saturday he intended to pursue his widening offensive, in which 85 soldiers have been killed, at least until it was clear how the UN resolution was going to be brought into force.

“The fact that a UN resolution was accepted on Saturday doesn’t apply immediately... We will continue to operate until we achieve our aims,” Halutz told a briefing.

His comments appeared in contrast to those of Shimon Peres, Israel’s deputy prime minister, who, while praising the role the military had played, seemed to suggest that its job was done and that diplomacy was now in the driving seat.

“Without the military pressure we would not have had the diplomatic deal, and without the diplomatic deal there would have been no point to the military action,” he told Israel radio.

Israel’s cabinet is expected to endorse the UN resolution at a meeting on Sunday. At least until then, it appears that the army has a green light to pursue its offensive.

The area from the border to the Litani would then effectively become the buffer zone from which Israeli forces would gradually have to withdraw as a 15,000-strong UN force, most likely led by France, steadily deploys.

UN Middle East envoy Alvaro de Soto told Reuters on Saturday the UN force could begin deploying in seven to 10 days, suggesting there is still some time before the “immediate cessation by Israel of all offensive military operations”, as called for in the resolution, actually comes into force.

Even after that time, Israel could still carry out operations against Hezbollah if it felt threatened, and it could be several more weeks before a permanent ceasefire — rather than merely a cessation of hostilities — is brought into force.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

WHILE launching the Economic Survey 2026, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told a hopeful story of economic...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...