Judicial disaffection

Published Updated
0

THE resignation of Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani from the Lahore High Court is another indicator of the deepening disaffection within Pakistan’s superior judiciary. That a senior judge should feel compelled to relinquish office on grounds of conscience speaks volumes about the conditions prevailing under the new constitutional order. Justice Kayani has cited personal and health reasons, but his criticism of the 26th and 27th Amendments is telling. He believes these changes have compromised the independence of the high courts and strengthened executive control over judicial appointments. His own transfer from the Islamabad High Court to the LHC, which cost him his seniority, provides important context. His departure follows the resignations of Justices Mansoor Ali Shah, Athar Minallah and Shams Mehmood Mirza, who also expressed grave reservations about the constitutional changes. These are experienced judges raising key questions about the judiciary’s ability to function independently. Their concerns cannot simply be dismissed.

Equally important is Justice Kayani’s warning about the ordinary litigant, whose interests, he says, have been neglected. This deserves serious attention. For millions of Pakistanis, approaching the courts already means enduring delays, mounting legal expenses and years of uncertainty. A judiciary whose independence is questioned can only deepen their sense of helplessness. If citizens begin to believe that judicial decisions may be influenced by powerful interests, their faith in obtaining a fair hearing will suffer. The constitutional amendments were defended as measures to improve the administration of justice, yet the growing unease among senior judges raises legitimate doubts about their consequences. The government and judicial leadership must acknowledge these concerns and address them through meaningful institutional dialogue. An independent judiciary is essential to protecting citizens against arbitrary power. When judges themselves question whether that independence can be maintained, the country has reason to worry.

Published in Dawn, October 30th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Candid admission
30 Oct, 2026

Candid admission

PARLIAMENT has recently been debating the future of Pakistani democracy, but those debates will be for naught unless...
Disrupted LPG supply
30 Oct, 2026

Disrupted LPG supply

THE petroleum minister’s explanation in the National Assembly that the recent closure of the Iran border has...
Judicial disaffection
30 Oct, 2026

Judicial disaffection

THE resignation of Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani from the Lahore High Court is another indicator of the deepening...
Restructuring plans
Updated 29 Oct, 2026

Restructuring plans

The primary reason for governance failure in Pakistan is not the geographical size of the existing provinces but the reluctance of provincial capitals to empower local bodies.
Polluted priorities
Updated 29 Oct, 2026

Polluted priorities

Enforcement must continue, but decisions should follow evidence, not the visibility of machinery on city roads.
Continuing genocide
29 Oct, 2026

Continuing genocide

FOR the people of Gaza, despite the ‘ceasefire’ reached last October, the genocide never really ceased. This ...