TRIPOLI, July 24: Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi, whose country abandoned weapons of mass destruction programmes in 2003, said that at one stage Libya had come close to building a nuclear bomb, the Libyan news agency reported on Monday.

It was the first time any Libyan official has confirmed that the north African country of more than five million had been trying to build a nuclear bomb.

“It is true that Libya came close to building a nuclear bomb. This is no longer a secret ... as everything was laid bare by the International Atomic (Energy) Agency for everyone to see,” the agency quoted Mr Qadhafi as saying on Sunday in a speech to Libyan engineers.

“The programmes and equipment (to build a nuclear bomb) are known,” he added.

Qadhafi, who was speaking mainly about the need for economic self-reliance, referred to Libya’s efforts to gain the bomb as one of several examples of Libyans being successful in challenging endeavours. He gave no further details.

The main point of Qadhafi’s speech was to say that he wanted to limit the role of foreigners in the economy to ensure as much of the country’s wealth as possible stayed at home.

In Dec 2003 Libya said it was abandoning its weapons of mass destruction programmes and would allow in international weapons inspectors.

The move was the most startling of several by Libya that helped the OPEC oil producer repair relations with the West after decades of estrangement.

The US government said in May that it would restore formal ties with Tripoli and take Libya off the list of countries deemed state sponsors of terrorism.

Qadhafi, elaborating on a long-standing explanation for his abandonment of confrontation with the West, said the time for spending large amounts of money on supporting political movements overseas was now over.

Although the support was a “must” at the time, it was clear that the effort had used up large amounts of resources.

“All revolutionaries used to come to the (Libyan) revolution for help. Revolutionaries in Latin America, Africa and Asia, sought our help, even the IRA (Irish Republican Army),” he said.

“I put a stop to this because we spent a great deal of money on the military side, not only in terms of construction.”

He said Libya had taken part in a “battle” for Arab nationalism, but this era was now over.

“There were hopes and aspirations to have a strong nationalist entity of which we would be a part, expanding from Iraq to Morocco, for example. This no longer valid,” he said. “Arabs would be one nation ... Unfortunately this has failed and that era ended and a new era began.”

“We have to learn lessons.”

—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...