Terrorism trials

Published
0

THE Punjab Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Bill, 2026, rests on a real problem. For decades, we have seen terrorism cases collapse and mass murderers go scot-free because those meant to prosecute them had no protection. Witnesses in terrorism trials withdrew their testimony, went missing, or simply refused to appear — they knew the state could not guarantee their safety. Judges hearing sensitive cases have faced threats that no amount of courage can overcome. Justice Arif Iqbal Bhatti was shot dead in his Lahore chambers in 1997, months after acquitting a blasphemy suspect. The delay in concluding such cases means that the accused are not punished and the innocent remain in jail for years. Anonymous courts and identity-shielded proceedings exist in countries, which concluded that open trials mean little if the people running them are dead or too frightened to speak.

That is the argument for the bill — but it does not answer the argument against it. A representation to the governor identifies a structural flaw that good intent cannot resolve. The bill hands the power to classify a case as a ‘special security case’ to a Grade-20 official. If the official decides that a case qualifies, control over witness coding, sealed records and video proceedings follow. It amounts to creating a parallel procedure in which the executive — and not the court — decides what constitutes a fair trial. Article 175(3) of the Constitution exists precisely to prevent this kind of arrangement. So does Article 10-A. A law that lets an official decide, without judicial oversight, whose trial gets sealed and whose witnesses get coded, can easily be abused by the government of the day. Intent does not travel with legislation once it is passed. Only the text does, and the text as summarised in the representation gives an administrative officer the authority that belongs, constitutionally, to a judge. This does not mean the bill should be shelved. It means the draft passed should not be the version that becomes law.

Published in Dawn, September 2nd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Cost of provinces
Updated 01 Nov, 2026

Cost of provinces

Political parties demanding new provinces must explain how they intend to pay for them and what improvements citizens can expect.
Exchange hack
01 Nov, 2026

Exchange hack

ON Thursday, the largest cryptocurrency heist in history saw some $6.3bn drained from exchange platform Binance’s...
Cyber safety
Updated 01 Nov, 2026

Cyber safety

The state of freedom of expression in Pakistan is already quite poor, so any further attempts to clamp down on free speech must be resisted.
China green channel
Updated 31 Oct, 2026

China green channel

The green channel is a useful step, given Pakistan identifies which agricultural products it can export, meets Chinese quality standards, and builds dependable supply chains.
Excessive punishment
Updated 31 Oct, 2026

Excessive punishment

It is unfortunate to see her and her husband punished so harshly for acts that seem downright frivolous compared to the violence actual terrorists routinely perpetrate.
Forced conversions
31 Oct, 2026

Forced conversions

THE institutional bias against minority females leaves them to either be directly victimised or to live in ...