PARIS: Embattled FIFA president Gianni Infantino will hope the departure of Kevin Lamour does not spark damaging revelations from the former chief operating officer of world football’s governing body.
Frenchman Lamour’s position -- which he had been in for less than two years — had become untenable after he broke ranks with senior FIFA directors last month and issued a scathing statement criticising Infantino over his botched plan to bring private investment into FIFA competitions, including World Cups.
Lamour had refused to sign off on the deal when — according to the New York Times — five FIFA directors had been briefed on the plan on the eve of last month’s World Cup final. Lamour described the proposal as “the project of one person”.
It was noticeable after his statement he had not been present when other senior FIFA directors attended an emergency meeting in Morocco a fortnight ago and declared their “full support” for Infantino.
Lamour’s criticism dealt a significant blow to 56-year-old Infantino.
Another damaging resignation was that of Infantino’s special advisor Carlos Cordeiro, who like the FIFA chief is close to US President Donald Trump.
“It is a bad deal for FIFA’s member associations, a bad deal for football, and a bad deal for the long-term future of the game,” wrote Cordeiro, a former investment banker.
Two other FIFA executives had also welcomed the ditching of the plan — it had been launched on July 28 and was scrapped by Saturday.
“Individuals, unstable moments and unfortunate episodes come and go,” FIFA secretary general Mattias Grafstrom said in an email he sent to staff.
“The institution, its mission and its responsibility towards world football continue.”
Arsene Wenger, chief of global football development, said it was “absolutely necessary” to scrap it.
Both Wenger and Grafstrom claimed ignorance over the private investment plan but nevertheless feature on a list of people instructed not to destroy “relevant materials” pertaining to it in a letter sent by the US lawyer of European football body UEFA, which has raised strong objections to Infantino remaining in his post.
Infantino’s move has provoked deep divisions among the sport’s confederations and within them too.
The presidents of UEFA — who described the plan as a “shabby, back room, opaque deal” — and the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) and North, Central America and the Caribbean’s ruling body CONCACAF presidents had issued a no-holds barred joint statement last week.
CONCACAF chief Victor Montagliani is widely seen as the likeliest challenger to Infantino and his bid for a fourth and final term in an election in Rabat next March.
However, while Europe appears united in wanting Infantino gone, Mexico — one of the co-hosts of this year’s World Cup — broke ranks with CONCACAF.
Mexico did not openly attack CONCACAF’s stance but in Asia, 2022 World Cup hosts Qatar have blasted the AFC for failing to consult them before issuing the joint statement.
Qatar Football Association president Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani demanded an explanation as to why no consultation had taken place and on what basis the AFC could speak on behalf of its 47 member associations, including Qatar.
Qatar is not alone among AFC members in issuing support for Infantino.
Kuwait, Lebanon, Sri Lanka and the Philippines have also publicly backed the Swiss lawyer.
AFC president Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim al-Khalifa — who finished runner-up to Infantino in the presidential election in 2016 — hit back to deny he exceeded his authority.
“I categorically reject any suggestion that my participation in the joint statement exceeded my authority or that the AFC erred in participating in it,” the Bahraini said in a letter seen by AFP on Tuesday.
On the flip side, the African Football Confederation (CAF) and South American governing body CONMEBOL back Infantino.
The Oceania Football Confederation (OFC) have also baulked at calling for Infantino to go but one of their members, New Zealand, rebelled and withdrew their support for his re-election.
Published in Dawn, August 19th, 2026
