Increase in agri tax challenged in LHC

Published
0
In this file photo, a farmer harvests wheat in Faisalabad.— APP/File
In this file photo, a farmer harvests wheat in Faisalabad.— APP/File

LAHORE: A petition has been filed before the Lahore High Court challenging the increase in agricultural tax in Punjab.

Opposition MPA Ijaz Shafi and the Judicial Activism Panel (JAP) filed the joint petition through Advocate Azhar Siddique, pleading that the government had unlawfully revised the agricultural income tax rates without mandatory legislative approval and by bypassing the constitutional role of the Assembly.

The petition argues that under Section 11(2) of the Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1997, as amended in 2024, any alteration in tax rates is required to be placed before the provincial assembly during the presentation of the annual budget.

It alleges that this mandatory statutory requirement was not followed by the provincial executive.

It contends that the impugned notifications violate Articles 4, 9, 19-A, 25, 38, 77 and 127 of the Constitution, asserting that the taxation cannot be imposed or altered through executive action without legislative sanction, transparency and constitutional oversight.

The petition relies on established constitutional jurisprudence, including the landmark judgment in Mustafa Impex case, and argues that the power to determine tax rates is an essential legislative function that cannot be delegated arbitrarily to the executive branch.

It pleads that the agricultural community has been subjected to discriminatory and unconstitutional taxation measures, adversely affecting farmers’ livelihoods, economic stability and legitimate expectations protected under the Constitution.

The petition seeks directions for disclosure of all communications with the IMF, production of complete records of tax collection since July 2025, suspension of recovery proceedings, withdrawal of the impugned notifications and refund of allegedly unlawfully collected amounts.

It further asks the court to set aside impugned notifications for being unconstitutional.

Published in Dawn, May 24th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

No talks
Updated 17 Oct, 2026

No talks

The government should understand that the PTI’s protest march and its reaction to it will look like nothing more than a storm in a teacup.
Strengthening LGs
17 Oct, 2026

Strengthening LGs

THE ECP has done well to refuse to allow the Punjab administration to push the local government elections to April....
Lesser citizens
17 Oct, 2026

Lesser citizens

FOR decades, discrimination and prejudice have narrowed the space for the country’s minority communities. The HRCP...
Deadly classrooms
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Deadly classrooms

Parents should not have to become structural engineers to judge whether their children are safe at school.
Diplomatic options
Updated 16 Oct, 2026

Diplomatic options

Regional states know that the alternative to talks — a fully fledged war on both fronts — will bring immeasurable destruction to the Gulf, the Red Sea and the surrounding areas.
Hunger in Pakistan
16 Oct, 2026

Hunger in Pakistan

PAKISTAN’S position as the country most affected by hunger in South Asia is not surprising. An economy battered by...