LHC sustains objection on plea against acquittal of PM Shehbaz, his sons in money laundering case

Published March 24, 2026
A file photo of Lahore Chief Justice Aalia Neelum. — Photo courtesy LHC website
A file photo of Lahore Chief Justice Aalia Neelum. — Photo courtesy LHC website

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday sustained an objection on the maintainability of a petition filed against the acquittal of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and his sons in a Rs16bn money laundering case.

LHC Chief Justice Aalia Neelum heard the plea filed by a young lawyer as an “objection case”. The office of the LHC’s registrar had objected to the maintainability of the petition, questioning the locus standi (the right to bring a legal action to a court) to agitate the matter.

During the hearing, the chief justice asked the petitioner’s counsel, Amir Saeed Rawn, how his client was an aggrieved party in the matter.

The LHC chief justice noted that the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), the prosecuting agency, had not filed any appeal against the acquittal judgment of the trial court.

To the court’s query, the counsel said the decision was issued in December 2022 despite the availability of substantial evidence in the case. He alleged that the FIA had colluded with the accused to secure the acquittal from the trial court.

The counsel further contended that courts could be approached even with a delay in matters of public interest.

However, Chief Justice Neelum upheld the objection raised by the registrar’s office.

Legal experts say that an appeal against acquittal or conviction in criminal cases can only be filed by the prosecution or the defence.

The FIA had booked PM Shehbaz and his sons — Hamza and Suleman Shehbaz — in November 2020 under Sections 419, 420, 468, 471, 34 and 109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, read with Section 3/4 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act 2010.

In October 2022, a special court had acquitted PM Shehbaz and his son Hamza in the money laundering case, saying there was no probability of conviction even if the prosecution’s evidence collected during the investigation was recorded. In July 2023, the trial court also acquitted Suleman.

The trial court had also ordered the Establishment Division secretary to initiate action against former adviser to the prime minister on accountability, Mirza Shahzad Akbar, and officials of the FIA for launching a frivolous and baseless prosecution against PM Shehbaz and other suspects in the case.

Akbar had also filed an appeal in the LHC challenging the trial court’s order. However, his appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution in 2025.

Opinion

Editorial

Removing subsidies
Updated 09 May, 2026

Removing subsidies

The government no longer has the budgetary space to continue carrying hundreds of billions of rupees in untargeted subsidies while the power sector itself remains trapped in circular debt, inefficiencies, theft and under-recovery.
Scarred at home
09 May, 2026

Scarred at home

WHEN homes turn violent towards children, the psychosocial damage is lifelong. In Pakistan, parental violence is...
Zionist zealotry
09 May, 2026

Zionist zealotry

BOTH the Israeli military and far-right citizens of the Zionist state have been involved in appalling hate crimes...
Shifting climate tone
Updated 08 May, 2026

Shifting climate tone

Our financial system is geared towards short-term, risk-averse lending, while climate adaptation and green infrastructure require patient, long-term capital.
Honour and impunity
08 May, 2026

Honour and impunity

THE Sindh Assembly’s discussion on karo-kari this week reminds us of the enduring nature of ‘honour’ killings...
No real change
08 May, 2026

No real change

THE Indian sports ministry’s move to allow Pakistani players and teams to participate in multilateral events ...