New US tariffs take effect after Supreme Court ruling

Published
0

WASHINGTON: Fresh US tariffs on imported goods came into effect on Tuesday, as President Donald Trump moved to rebuild his trade agenda after the Supreme Court ruled against a swath of his global duties.

The new tariffs, initially set at 10 per cent, are justified as a means “to deal with the large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits,” according to a White House press release.

Trump has since vowed to raise this level to 15pc, with exclusions expected to remain for goods covered by sector-specific investigations and the US-Mexico-Canada trade pact. The US president has doubled down on imposing tariffs on trading partners since the high court on Friday struck down many of his sweeping and often arbitrary duties, in a rebuke of his signature economic policy.

His sector-specific tariffs on goods like steel and autos remain intact, but the ruling sets the stage for a complex fight for refunds elsewhere. The new duty taking effect on Tuesday only lasts for 150 days unless extended by Con­gress and is widely seen as a bridge towards more durable trade policy.

US Customs and Border Protection has said it would stop collecting tariffs struck down by the court starting Tuesday, too. It separately said it would start collecting the new 10pc tariffs on Tuesday.

The conservative-majority court ruled six to three that Trump had exceeded his authority in using a 1977 law to impose sudden tariffs on individual countries. Trump’s new tariff will apply to $1.2 trillion worth of imports on an annual basis or about 34pc of total goods imported, said Erica York, vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation.

“The Trump tariffs amo­unted to an average tax increase per US household of $1,000 in 2025,” she added.

With Trump’s global tariffs ruled illegal, his new and existing duties are still set to “result in a household burden of $700 in 2026,” she said.

Published in Dawn, February 25th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...