SC stays PHC order to tax Eva­cuee Trust Property Board assets

Published
0
A general view of the Supreme Court in Islamabad on April 4, 2022. — Reuters/File
A general view of the Supreme Court in Islamabad on April 4, 2022. — Reuters/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court’s Constitutional Bench (CB) on Friday suspended the Peshawar High Court’s March 10, 2020, order that upheld the Cantonment Board Peshawar’s authority to levy property tax on assets managed by the Eva­cuee Trust Property Board (ETPB).

The five-judge bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, also issued notices to the Cantonment Board Peshawar and the Khyber Pakhtu­nkhwa Excise Department on ETPB’s civil appeals challenging the imposition of tax on federal properties vested in and managed by the federal government through the board.

Appearing on behalf of ETPB, senior advocate Hafiz Ehsaan Ahmad Khokhar submitted that the levy of property tax on the federal properties was unconstitutional and violated Article 165 of the Constitution, which he said categorically barred the imposition of any provincial or local tax on the property of the federation without its consent.

The counsel emphasised that no such consent was ever acc­orded by the federal government, rendering the impugned notices void ab initio.

Board’s lawyer argues local tax can’t be levied on federal assets

Advocate Khokhar argued that under Section 6 of the Evacuee Trust Properties (Management and Disp­o­sal) Act, 1975, all evacuee trust properties stand vested in the government, with the ETPB serving mer­ely as its statutory instrumentality.

Accordingly, any attempt by a Cantonment Board to impose property tax on such properties amounted to taxing the federation itself, a measure expressly prohibited by the constitutional scheme, he said.

Referring to Article 265 of the Constitution, the counsel contended that no tax can be levied or collected except by authority of law, and any levy inconsistent with the Const­itution or imposed without legislative competence was null and void.

Since the Cantonment Board derives its powers solely from delegated legislation and lacks constitutional competence to tax federal property, its imposition constitutes a clear usurpation of federal fiscal authority.

The counsel submitted that ETPB properties were federal in nature as per Section 6 of the ETPB Act 1975, dedicated to religious, charitable and welfare purposes, and maintained through federal resources without availing local municipal services.

Published in Dawn, November 1st, 2025

Follow Dawn Business on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...