Hezbollah rejects Beirut’s decision to disarm it

Published August 7, 2025
This handout photo released by the Lebanese Presidency press office on August 5 shows Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun (C) chairing a cabinet session to discuss the issue of disarming Hezbollah at the presidential palace of Baabda east of Beirut. — AFP
This handout photo released by the Lebanese Presidency press office on August 5 shows Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun (C) chairing a cabinet session to discuss the issue of disarming Hezbollah at the presidential palace of Baabda east of Beirut. — AFP

BEIRUT: Hezbollah said on Wednesday it would treat a Lebanese government decision to disarm the militant group “as if it did not exist”, accusing the cabinet of committing a “grave sin”.

Amid heavy US pressure and fears Israel could expand its strikes on Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said on Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end.

The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval, and another cabinet meeting has been scheduled for Thursday to continue the talks, including on a US-proposed timetable for disarmament.

Hezbollah said the government had “committed a grave sin by taking the decision to disarm Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy”. The decision on the thorny issue is unprecedented since Lebanon’s civil war factions gave up their weapons three and a half decades ago.

“This decision undermines Lebanon’s sovereignty and gives Israel a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence…Therefore, we will treat this decision as if it does not exist,” the Iran-backed group said in a statement.

Group says move serves Israel’s interests, leaves Lebanon exposed to the enemy without any deterrence

‘Serves Israel’s interests’

The government said its decision came as part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah which culminated in two months of full-blown war. Hezbollah said it viewed the government’s move as “the result of dictates from US envoy” Tom Barrack.

It “fully serves Israel’s interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence”, the group said.

Hezbollah was the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon’s 1975-1990 civil war. It emerged weakened politically and militarily from its latest conflict with Israel, its arsenal pummelled and its senior leadership decimated.

Israel has kept up its strikes on Hezbollah and other targets despite the November truce, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed.

An Israeli strike on the southern town of Tulin on Wednesday killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said. Hezbollah said Israel must halt those attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defence strategy can begin.

‘Pivotal moment’

“We are open to dialogue, ending the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, liberating its land, releasing prisoners, working to build the state, and rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal aggression,” the group said.

Hezbollah is “prepared to discuss a national security strategy”, but not under Israeli fire, it added. Two ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and its ally the Amal movement walked out of Tuesday’s meeting.

Published in Dawn, August 7th, 2025

Opinion

Geopolitical shift in ME

Geopolitical shift in ME

A prolonged conflict will have far-reaching implications for regional geopolitics, sharpening the divisions among Gulf countries that are directly affected by the tensions.

Editorial

Unyielding stances
Updated 13 May, 2026

Unyielding stances

Every day that passes without clarity on how and when the war will end introduces fresh intensity to the uncertainty roiling global markets and adds to the economic turmoil the world must bear because of it.
Gwadar rising?
13 May, 2026

Gwadar rising?

COULD the Middle East conflict prove to be a boon for the Gwadar port? Islamabad’s push to position Gwadar as a...
Locked in
13 May, 2026

Locked in

THE acquittal of as many as 74 PTI activists by a Peshawar court in a case pertaining to the May 2023 violence is a...
Bannu attack
Updated 12 May, 2026

Bannu attack

The security narrative and strategy of the KP government diverges considerably from the state’s position.
Cotton crisis
12 May, 2026

Cotton crisis

PAKISTAN’S cotton economy is once again facing a crisis that exposes the country’s flawed agricultural and...
Buddhist heritage
12 May, 2026

Buddhist heritage

THE revival of Buddhist chants at the ancient Dharmarajika Stupa in Taxila after nearly 1,500 years is much more ...