Justice Sattar questions acting IHC CJ’s power to reassign cases

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: Justice Babar Sattar of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has questioned the chief justice’s authority to administratively reassign cases, emphasising that such decisions fall within the jurisdiction of judges and the deputy registrar.

Justice Sattar issued the remarks in an order addressing the reassignment of a writ petition — No. 937/2025 (Muhammad Nadeem vs Federation of Pakistan) — which challenges the acting chief justice’s intervention in retaining the case before a bench that had previously recused itself.

The case was initially transferred to another bench on March 14, after the original bench deem­­­ed reassignment appropriate.

However, following remarks from the acting chief justice’s office, the file was returned to the same bench, prompting Justice Sattar to rule the intervention as “not in accordance with the High Court Rules”.

Says reassignment requests must be routed through deputy registrar

In a detailed order, Justice Sattar cited Rule 4 of Part A, Chapter 3 of Volume V of the Lahore High Court Rules (adopted by the IHC), which mandates that once a case is assigned to a bench, only that bench or the deputy registrar — guided by the approved roster — can decide transfers or recusals.

The chief justice’s role, the order clarified, is limited to approving the roster of benches prepared by the deputy registrar, not intervening in individual case assignments.

“The Chief Justice has no authority to determine on the administrative side whether a court ought to hear a case,” Justice Sattar stated, calling the return of the case an “inadvertent mistake”.

He further stressed that reassignment requests must be routed through the deputy registrar (judicial) to ensure compliance with institutional protocols.

Justice Sattar directed that the file be sent to the deputy registrar for reassignment to an available bench.

“Once a judge determines recusal, the judicial order is not amenable to interference by the Chief Justice’s office; the matter must be marked to the Deputy Registrar,” he observed.

Published in Dawn, March 29th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Regional security
Updated 28 Oct, 2026

Regional security

Iran and the Makkah pact states should pledge not to let external actors use their soil to launch aggression against each other.
Rate hike
28 Oct, 2026

Rate hike

THE SBP’s decision to raise its policy rate by 50 basis points to 12pc was largely expected. It is also justified...
Press solidarity
28 Oct, 2026

Press solidarity

PAKISTAN’S journalists have seldom lacked organisations speaking in defence of press freedom. What has been ...
Privatisation framework
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Privatisation framework

The proposed merger of the Privatisation Commission and the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) into a single institution is a sensible move.
Chromebook scheme
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Chromebook scheme

Technology can widen opportunity, but only when it is tied to good teaching, reliable connectivity and clear educational purpose.
Dengue season
27 Oct, 2026

Dengue season

ANOTHER dengue outbreak looms over the country for reasons of lack of preparedness and negligence. This month’s...